sunshine_eggo
Happy Breffast!
Another thing I'm thinking about and i don't know how this works exactly but Ive seen vids that suggest if you are using power directly from pv it's more efficient than storing it in the battery first and then using it later
Battery charging isn't 100% efficient. Lead acid can be as low as 85% average, and it's even worse in the absorption phase.
LFP charging is pretty darn efficient.
So what I'm thinking is that with a west facing array ,for example, the power is available later in the day when it's needed so it could be pulling straight from pv instead of battery, say for example at 6pm in the summer when I imagine a south facing array is already done.
This would mean some efficiency gains vs a south array correct?
Theoretically, but not a lot.
Now, where I'm confused,or skeptical is this. How can battery inverter consume directly from the pv(charge controller) when the job of the charge controller is to, wait for it, charge the battery?
An inverter inverts DC to AC. It's a system. Current is either going into or out of the DC system or in equilibrium.
It's makes no sense because to my thinking the charge controller is always charging the battery and the inverter will always pull from battery, no?
Load = battery voltage dip
battery voltage dip = charger supplies more current to maintain battery voltage.
Net result = MPPT is feeding load directly and providing "float current" to the battery.
Victron MPPT run without battery once battery voltage has been established. I was shutting my system down and not really thinking about it in detail. It was in the evening, so not a lot of juice coming in. Loads were < 200W, so order didn't matter in my head. When I turned the battery switch off, I had a stupefying moment where the system was still running with the battery completely isolated. Occurred to me the system was being powered directly by the MPPT... forgot about that feature.