rwhite8134
New Member
You can do that as long as you either have a risk tolerance for an unapproved parallel setup (using zero export to hide), or know how to pick equipment that works fine off grid and later transition to on grid. Off hand the easiest way maybe is to use an external AC charger to charge the battery instead of directly connecting to grid. This would be fine from a POCO angle but it will violate UL9540 rules on ESS because there are pretty much zero approved chargers unless you buy a second UL9540 hybrid ($$$$$) and use it exclusively for charging. Again this somewhat boils down to a risk tolerance for doing not what your supposed to do
And a risk tolerance for the equipment being rejected due to you or your designer misunderstanding various technical things.
I feel the amount of extra work it will take you to understand the engineering / design will outweigh the benefit of skipping the first interconnect review.
The garage loads are non-critical. I wouldn't even care about charging the battery via AC/grid. Whatever PV makes I could use and/or store. When we get to the point next year of installing PV on the house and connecting critical house loads to the inverter(s) then doing Interconnection would make sense. But I totally get your point that if I already purchased inverter(s) and POCO says no-no next year then I got to get something else.
Good food for thought. I really appreciate the input guys.