I'm also an engineer, one year out from retirement. I'm also a data guy. Same company for 31 years, 80k employees.
Your primary issue is that you haven't broken through the layer of global censorship yet. Once you do, you will find that the people pulling the strings have more control than you would like to believe. The WEF and their corporate members literally control every media and tech platform on the planet. This is why they can get away with their propaganda and "take down" of almost every dissenting voice, no matter their expertise. As Bret Weinstein would say, "zero is a special number". There was literally no avenue for opposing viewpoints to pervade the public awareness, giving the appearance that there was little dissent. It allows people like you to feel confident in your position, but that confidence is built on a preponderance of propaganda and lies from your trusted "experts". This is why you automatically default to using the word "conspiracy". Anything that challenges the "mainstream consensus" is labeled "right wing conspiracy".
Now that Twitter is allowing open debate and discussion, that number is greater than zero, so the information is getting through to people who are open to other narratives. Since you haven't been exposed to other experts speaking truth and providing supporting data and evidence, you believe there is no other valid position. Have you watched hours of testimony from Dr. McCullough in front of senate panel committees? Have your read his 200 page CV attached to various lawsuits against our health authorities? Do you even conceive of the possibility that the pharmaceutical industry can use their money and power to capture regulatory bodies and fund studies to make sure they get the result they want? Have you watched testimony of these officials and read their emails admitting their part in the corruption? I have. The information is out there if you decide you'd like to entertain data that may be antithetical to your core beliefs. Looking at this data and considering possible motivating factors like profit/greed doesn't make someone mentally ill.
I'll give you but one example of Dr. Tess Laurie referencing her exchange with Andrew Hill and his admission to altering study data related to early treatment of COVID and it's impact on the WHO decision making:
worldcouncilforhealth.org
Always follow the money, and you will usually find the motive. Most systems we rely on have been corrupted by greed to some extent. To not even entertain this possibility means that you will remain ignorant to the pervasiveness of that corruption. It's not rocket science...it simply takes the will to step outside your box.
Your primary issue is that you haven't broken through the layer of global censorship yet. Once you do, you will find that the people pulling the strings have more control than you would like to believe. The WEF and their corporate members literally control every media and tech platform on the planet. This is why they can get away with their propaganda and "take down" of almost every dissenting voice, no matter their expertise. As Bret Weinstein would say, "zero is a special number". There was literally no avenue for opposing viewpoints to pervade the public awareness, giving the appearance that there was little dissent. It allows people like you to feel confident in your position, but that confidence is built on a preponderance of propaganda and lies from your trusted "experts". This is why you automatically default to using the word "conspiracy". Anything that challenges the "mainstream consensus" is labeled "right wing conspiracy".
Now that Twitter is allowing open debate and discussion, that number is greater than zero, so the information is getting through to people who are open to other narratives. Since you haven't been exposed to other experts speaking truth and providing supporting data and evidence, you believe there is no other valid position. Have you watched hours of testimony from Dr. McCullough in front of senate panel committees? Have your read his 200 page CV attached to various lawsuits against our health authorities? Do you even conceive of the possibility that the pharmaceutical industry can use their money and power to capture regulatory bodies and fund studies to make sure they get the result they want? Have you watched testimony of these officials and read their emails admitting their part in the corruption? I have. The information is out there if you decide you'd like to entertain data that may be antithetical to your core beliefs. Looking at this data and considering possible motivating factors like profit/greed doesn't make someone mentally ill.
I'll give you but one example of Dr. Tess Laurie referencing her exchange with Andrew Hill and his admission to altering study data related to early treatment of COVID and it's impact on the WHO decision making:
Dear Andy (Short Film) | World Council for Health
Watch the new short film by Oracle Films, Dr. Tess Lawrie recites a letter to Dr. Andrew Hill and asks him what made him turn his back on a potential cure for
![worldcouncilforhealth.org](https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/cropped-WCH-mark-favicon-32x32.png)
Always follow the money, and you will usually find the motive. Most systems we rely on have been corrupted by greed to some extent. To not even entertain this possibility means that you will remain ignorant to the pervasiveness of that corruption. It's not rocket science...it simply takes the will to step outside your box.
Last edited: