I gave it a few days to look over everything that he posted and think about it.Being an admin/ moderator on a forum is a tough job. Almost all of us post answers that others could reasonably debate and anyone can get a little bit testy in a disagreement. But at a certain point, after a mountain of just plain wrong information is posted with massive amounts of attitude, I suggest that perhaps it becomes a preponderance of evidence situation. Which goes back to the tough job...
As others have noted, "ignore" is helpful but it doesn't help a person with little knowledge sort through and separate good advice from gibberish. Perhaps repeated postings of just plain wrong information (probably something Will or other admins with much knowledge must determine) becomes the standard for any of us? Just a thought.
At the end of the day I realize that multiple members had multiple issues with his posts. One of the rules here on the forum is if multiple members are not happy with an individual member's behavior, they can be warned. That did not seem to help so I issued a ban until the end of the month.
I felt like he was very manipulative at times. To make it seem like he wasn't doing anything wrong. Endless paragraphs trying to justify his side. He also claimed to have known me for years but I don't know him. I think he was trying to use that to create credibility. Not sure really.
But the common denominator for many reports here on the forum in the last few days was him. And once the ban was issued everything went back to normal again. Seems like it worked.