Thanks, thats interesting.Monitor/balancers, pre-bms era.
These where pretty common on older setups. Those likely just start burning off current above some arbitrary voltage.
The more sophisticated ones had a single signal cable that could engage a control circuit. Each was connected to the next in series. At the ends of the series, those could be connected to a relay or an input. If any of the monitors observed an errant voltage, they could open or close the circuit to trigger some sort of secondary cut off.
How do they communicate? they only seem to be connected to the + and -. Do they have some kind of bluetooth integrated?Something like this.
View attachment 110625
View attachment 110626
Senseboards that communicate with cpu/ ems.
Unlikely they are balancers just look like distributed Bms cell monitors to me
There must be a connection else they can’t balance either. I see no suitable balancing resistors on these boards so I suspect they are not passive balancersMine are also balancers as they start burning off somewhere around 3.7V. Little resistors get hot.
Given that the OP's pics have no connections between monitors or other devices, their only function could be balancing.
There must be a connection else they can’t balance either.
I see no suitable balancing resistors on these boards so I suspect they are not passive balancers
Well unless there is a communications link from each module somewhere it’s not doing either monitoring or balancing.You already corrected yourself in the next sentence.
No one has said "active" balancers until you implied it.
What's "suitable"? I definitely see some things that could be resistors in the OP's blurry picture. "suitable" for passive balancing is often 30-70mA, and I bet they'd fit the bill.