svetz
Works in theory! Practice? That's something else
@GXMnow was talking about the power factor of his LED bulbs and I posted they had them with higher power factors.
His 8W LED bulbs had a power factor of .78. Since you have to pay for the reactive and active power, the total consumption should be:
The real proof though is how much light per watt you get. This 800 lumen bulb (about equivalent to a 60W incandescent bulb) consumes 10W active power, probably has a power factor of around 75%, so, 800/10/.75 = 106 lumens/Watt, that seems pretty consistent.
While I was googling I came across this:
So, the new bulbs at 200 l/W are twice as efficient! The article is from 2015. So, where are these 800-lumen 4W bulbs?
Does anyone know?
His 8W LED bulbs had a power factor of .78. Since you have to pay for the reactive and active power, the total consumption should be:
8Wactive / .78total/active = 10.25WTotal
Not much, but with dozens of bulbs per house and millions of homes over the years it adds up. The higher power factor LED lights burn less power for the same amount of light.The real proof though is how much light per watt you get. This 800 lumen bulb (about equivalent to a 60W incandescent bulb) consumes 10W active power, probably has a power factor of around 75%, so, 800/10/.75 = 106 lumens/Watt, that seems pretty consistent.
While I was googling I came across this:
Lighting world first: Philips breaks 200 lumens per watt barrier
So, the new bulbs at 200 l/W are twice as efficient! The article is from 2015. So, where are these 800-lumen 4W bulbs?
Does anyone know?
Last edited: