diy solar

diy solar

Can Solar & Wind Fix Everything (e.g., Climate Change) with a battery break-through?

I think many organizations are hiring people for qualities other than competence. For instance I could run statistics on FDA's data (regarding analysis of pet jerky ingredients) and come to opposite conclusion they published (where they said that ethylene glycol was ruled out as the lethal compound).

While it is possible they are simply pushing an agenda, incompetence abounds.
 

SMH: Radio Silence Replaces Greenwashing Claims​

Stronger laws against false climate claims appear to have silenced former corporate green enthusiasts.

Radio silence replaces greenwashing claims
By Anna Patty
Updated April 3, 2023 — 4.14pmfirst published at 5.00am
Australian companies are walking back their public commitments to climate action as part of a growing global trend known as “green hushing”.
With Australian regulators now cracking down on alleged greenwashing, companies have been put on notice that they face an increased risk of legal action for false claims.
The biggest superannuation fund in the country, AustralianSuper, removed its climate report from its website on March 22. The copy on the website where the report used to sit now says: “We are currently updating our climate change report. A new version will be available soon.”
A “net zero by 2050” fact sheet, which included a commitment to active ownership to drive climate action, was removed from AustralianSuper’s website in March.

Read more: https://www.smh.com.au/business/con...aces-greenwashing-claims-20230320-p5ctl8.html
I’m surprised companies are being so allegedly duplicitous. I mean, everyone knows green technology and production processes are the cheapest option, so why exaggerate your climate claims? /sarc

It would be nice to think companies might finally grow a spine and push back against the green blight, but then they’d have to face the embarrassment of trying to explain their previous positions and claims.

Meanwhile back in the real world, as the West tracks towards shutting down all domestic energy intensive manufacturing, and much of its mining industry, in 2022 China built two coal plants per WEEK, a marked acceleration on previous years.

China’s production capacity significantly exceeds the production capacity of the United States, yet China is building even more capacity, one the eve of what promises to be a severe economic downturn. Almost like China is getting ready for something.

Recently China started accepting imports of Aussie coal again, especially metallurgical coal, you know, the kind of high quality Aussie coal required to manufacture vast tonnages of high grade steel.

But how does this reconcile with China’s economic problems? China’s economy is in a woeful state, and their government is struggling with enormous debts.

I wonder what they need all that steel for?
 

COP28 Organisers Already Accused of Greenwashing​

The COP website has a “low carbon” toggle which has been criticised as having minimal impact on the site energy usage.

United Nations COP28 climate summit reworks website following greenwashing allegations over ‘low carbon’ toggle
By Tom Williams
Organisers of the COP28 climate summit in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) have reworked their event’s official website following allegations of greenwashing over a “low carbon” toggle which was found to have a minor impact on the site’s energy usage.
Key points:
  • The website of the COP28 climate conference was modified after it was accused of greenwashing
  • A toggle for a “low carbon version” of the site was found to have little impact on the site’s energy use
  • Site updates were welcomed by a web sustainability consult, but they said “more needs to be done”

The toggle’s effectiveness has been criticised by experienced website developers who have accused COP28 organisers of greenwashing — a term referring to making misleading or false claims about the environmental sustainability of a product or service.
ABC News initially found that when the “low carbon” toggle was switched on, the COP28 site did not display some of its images, but still downloaded all of them in the background — offering only a minuscule amount of energy saving.

Read more: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-10...sed-greenwashing-website-low-carbon/103020978
I tried the toggle, the website then appeared to malfunction until I reloaded it. The malfunction might have been due to my less than perfect internet connection.

The main impact of the toggle appears to be to switch off some of the annoying animations, which includes pictures of solar panels and large concrete structures.

The ABC criticism may be a bit unfair. High resolution graphics animations can actually burn a fair bit of electricity, that is why computer graphics cards often need fancy heatsinks. But frankly I can’t be bothered to work out something so ridiculously trivial, whether the burn from running an on screen animation is significant compared to the energy required to push information halfway around the world.

Yep, for sure these people are going to save the world this time.
 

Scottish battery factory goes bust in fresh blow to UK’s net zero industry​


Eventually they might work out that you cannot create jobs by government diktat!

image-53.png

AMTE Power, a high-performance battery developer, has called in administrators in a fresh blow to Britain’s net zero industry.

The company warned in the summer that it was in financial trouble and had days to find a new backer or help from existing shareholders.

An investor pulled the plug on fresh funding after plans to build a new plant in Dundee were scrapped.

AMTE said in a stock market notice: “The board has no other options to secure finance in the time available and has therefore concluded that the company has insufficient funds to continue trading.”

It said it appointed FRP Advisory as administrator to find a buyer and trading of its shares are suspended.

The company, which is based in Oxfordshire but has its main operations in Thurso, planned a 0.5GWh half-gigafactory in Dundee to make batteries for potential clients such as BMW and Cosworth.

AMTE had a long history in
developing lithium cells, making some of the first examples in the 1990s. Recently, AMTE said it tested cells that can be charged fully in six minutes in a breakthrough for charging technology.

However, it has been making a loss. It did not get the
firm orders it needed from carmakers and other potential customers, or a patient investor that could fuel an expansion in production.

AMTE’s fate mirrors that of Britishvolt, another would-be independent UK gigafactory.

Britishvolt was the brainchild of former investment banker Orral Nadjari, who saw the looming demand for batteries from carmakers in the UK and a gap in the market for an independent producer, planning a £3.8bn factory in Blyth, Northumberland.

But it ran out of funding after borrowing became more expensive. At the time of its demise in January, the company had signed initial deals with carmakers such as Aston Martin, but it had secured no firm orders.


https://www.telegraph.co.uk/busines...ttery-factory-bust-britain-net-zero-industry/
 

COP 28: Climate Hysteric Peter Kalmus Has the Sads​


In the latest episode of what could be mistaken for a satirical comedy, Dr. Peter Kalmus, a self-proclaimed climate activist and NASA scientist, has expressed his dismay over the recent COP28 summit. His opinion piece, “COP Out: Wrapping Up a Useless Climate Summit That Should Fool Nobody,” reads like a script from a dystopian drama where the villains are fossil fuels, and the heroes are, well, apparently not the attendees of COP28.


Kalmus paints a picture of COP28 as a grand assembly of the world’s elite, jetting in on their private planes to a petrostate, to discuss the perils of the very industry that fueled their arrival. The irony is so thick here that one could cut it with a knife. The summit, according to Kalmus, was nothing more than a stage for the fossil fuel industry to make “dirty side deals”.

Some wealthy humans flew on private jets to the United Arab Emirates, a petrostate, for a two-week meeting. Many of these humans work for the fossil fuel industry. The petrostate leveraged its host status for dirty side deals to expand fossil fuels. There was a session on sustainable megayacht ownership.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/mar...1&cvid=ad9c0e089b12489a875e5a576bcb4cf5&ei=24
The appointment of Sultan al-Jaber, a fossil fuel CEO, as the presiding official of a climate summit is akin to putting a fox in charge of the henhouse, suggests Kalmus. His portrayal of al-Jaber’s promises to continue investing in oil and expanding fossil fuels post-summit paints a picture of a mustache-twirling villain, gleefully plotting the world’s demise.

The presiding official was a fossil fuel CEO, Sultan al-Jaber, who, days earlier, had said some anti-science, denialist garbage-words. Two days after the meeting ended, he promised that his oil corporation will continue investing in oil and expanding fossil fuels. OPEC, in a joint statement with the Gas Exporting Countries Forum, congratulated the UAE on the “positive outcome” for the fossil fuel industry.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/mar...1&cvid=ad9c0e089b12489a875e5a576bcb4cf5&ei=24
Kalmus doesn’t hold back in his apocalyptic vision of a world ravaged by global heating, with floods, fires, and broken systems. The fossil fuel industry and industrial animal agriculture are the chief architects of this impending doom. One might expect a superhero to swoop in any moment now to save the day, but alas, this is the real world, and Kalmus seems to believe we’re fresh out of caped crusaders.

We are all in grave danger from global heating, which appears to be accelerating, is irreversible, and is driving all the flooding and heat and fires. It’s caused almost entirely by the fossil fuel industry, with industrial animal agriculture in second place.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/mar...1&cvid=ad9c0e089b12489a875e5a576bcb4cf5&ei=24
The COP28’s 21-page “global stocktake” is ridiculed as too little, too late. Kalmus is appalled that it took thirty years just to mention fossil fuels in a COP decision text. The stocktake’s call for transitioning away from fossil fuels in energy systems is dismissed as nonbinding, unquantitative, and insincere. It’s as if Kalmus expected a binding global treaty to be signed then and there, magically solving all climate issues.

The wealthy fossil-fuel-industry-influenced humans at COP28 produced 21 pages called the “global stocktake.” The stocktake mentions “fossil fuels” once, on page 4. People who wish to argue that COP28 wasn’t a complete failure have been calling this “historic.” And technically it is, because fossil fuels have never been mentioned in a COP decision text.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/mar...1&cvid=ad9c0e089b12489a875e5a576bcb4cf5&ei=24
The loss and damage pledges from rich nations, amounting to $700 million, are scoffed at as grossly inadequate. Kalmus compares the United States’ pledge of less than $20 million to the budget of an average high school, highlighting the disparity between the scale of the problem and the response.

In Kalmus’s eyes, COP28 was nothing short of a spectacular failure, a charade that serves only to perpetuate the status quo. He calls for a new international summit and fossil fuel treaty system, free from the influence of the fossil fuel industry. His solution? A stronger climate movement and a ban on the fossil fuel industry from negotiations.

We need to start by agreeing that COP28, like other COPs, was a complete failure. Claiming that it was somehow not a failure, clinging to bits of false hope, generates a powerful illusion that business as usual can continue. We’ve been doing this for 30 years now. The possibility of keeping heating to under 1.5 degrees C has been squandered. If we cling to false hope that it’s working, we will keep doing it, year after year, making no progress. This is what the fossil fuel industry wants; this is how we lose a planet.
We then need to establish an international summit and fossil fuel treaty system that isn’t broken under the weight of fossil fuel industry corruption. To do this, we need to ban the fossil fuel industry from the negotiations, and doing this will require a stronger climate movement. Every single one of us can work, in our own way, to make the movement stronger. Be a climate activist: join with other climate activists—we’re not hard to find—and take risks. It’s up to us.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/mar...1&cvid=ad9c0e089b12489a875e5a576bcb4cf5&ei=24
 

A good example of how you can't distinguish between headlines about leftists and satire.

When I’m meditating, I don’t feel anxious,” Kalmus later says, explaining that he strives for two hours of meditation a day to keep his climate anxiety at bay. Otherwise, “it’s completely overwhelming.”

Many of us avoid thinking too deeply about the worst scenarios of climate change. He is fixated on them.
 

A good example of how you can't distinguish between headlines about leftists and satire.

When I’m meditating, I don’t feel anxious,” Kalmus later says, explaining that he strives for two hours of meditation a day to keep his climate anxiety at bay. Otherwise, “it’s completely overwhelming.”

Many of us avoid thinking too deeply about the worst scenarios of climate change. He is fixated on them.
The media is causing mental health problems across the world
 
Follow the money


“Environmental Justice” $ub$umes Everything​

Screenshot-2023-12-20-at-7.04.25-PM-300x125.jpg


Screenshot-2023-12-20-at-7.05.15-PM-300x138.jpg


Particularly on the heels of this email from a well-placed (and he wants you to know it!) Washington lawyer to his alma mater, UCLA Law School.

Subsume-everything-300x183.jpg


Lookie here:

Screenshot-2023-12-22-at-12.45.50-PM-300x163.jpg
 
Follow the money


“Environmental Justice” $ub$umes Everything​

Screenshot-2023-12-20-at-7.04.25-PM-300x125.jpg


Screenshot-2023-12-20-at-7.05.15-PM-300x138.jpg


Particularly on the heels of this email from a well-placed (and he wants you to know it!) Washington lawyer to his alma mater, UCLA Law School.

Subsume-everything-300x183.jpg


Lookie here:

Screenshot-2023-12-22-at-12.45.50-PM-300x163.jpg
They always use taxpayer money to fund their little projects. I could use a grant too.
 

The EV Graveyard Reckoning, Hardly Anyone Wants To Buy A Used One​

The market for used EVs is plummeting. What will car rental companies do with the used ones? Problems started in China but have spread to Europe and the US.




China’s Abandoned, Obsolete Electric Cars Are Piling Up in Cities

Bloomberg notes China’s Abandoned, Obsolete Electric Cars Are Piling Up in Cities

A subsidy-fueled boom helped build China into an electric-car giant but left weed-infested lots across the nation brimming with unwanted battery-powered vehicles.
On the outskirts of the Chinese city of Hangzhou, a small dilapidated temple overlooks a graveyard of sorts: a series of fields where hundreds upon hundreds of electric cars have been abandoned among weeds and garbage.
Similar pools of unwanted battery-powered vehicles have sprouted up in at least half a dozen cities across China, though a few have been cleaned up. In Hangzhou, some cars have been left for so long that plants are sprouting from their trunks. Others were discarded in such a hurry that fluffy toys still sit on their dashboards.
The cars were likely deserted after the ride-hailing companies that owned them failed, or because they were about to become obsolete as automakers rolled out EV after EV with better features and longer driving ranges. They’re a striking representation of the excess and waste that can happen when capital floods into a burgeoning industry, and perhaps also an odd monument to the seismic progress in electric transportation over the last few years.
Shenzhen-based photographer Wu Guoyong was one of the first people in China to document the waste that results from frenetic development, taking striking drone shots of the piles of abandoned bicycles in 2018. In 2019, he filmed aerial footage of thousands of electric cars in empty lots around Hangzhou and Nanjing, the capital of China’s eastern Jiangsu province.
“The shared bikes and EV graveyards are a result of unconstrained capitalism,” Wu said. “The waste of resources, the damage to the environment, the vanishing wealth, it’s a natural consequence.”

Hoot of the Day

EV graveyards are a result of unconstrained capitalism.

Mercy!

The Chinese government literally forced people to buy the damn things. Biden is attempting the same in the US.

That article is from August. Let’s flash forward to December 21 to see how things are going in Europe.

No One Wants Used EVs, Making New Ones a Tougher Sell Too

What started in China is not limited to China. A second Bloomberg article reveals No One Wants Used EVs, Making New Ones a Tougher Sell Too

Because most new vehicles in Europe are sold via leases, automakers and dealers who finance these transactions are trying to recover losses from plummeting valuations by raising borrowing costs. That’s hitting demand in some European markets that were in the vanguard of the shift away from fossil fuel-powered propulsion. Some of the biggest buyers of new cars, including rental firms, are cutting back on EV adoption because they’re losing money on resales, with Sixt SE dropping Tesla models from its fleet.
The problems are expected to intensify next year, when many of the 1.2 million EVs sold in Europe in 2021 will come off their three-year leasing contracts and enter the secondhand market. How companies tackle this problem will be key for their bottom lines, consumer confidence and ultimately decarbonization — including the European Union’s plan to phase out sales of new fuel-burning cars by 2035.
“There isn’t used-car demand for EVs,” said Matt Harrison, Toyota Motor Corp.’s chief operating officer in Europe. “That’s really hurting the cost-of-ownership story.”
“One has to slash prices significantly just to get customers to look at EVs,” said Dirk Weddigen von Knapp, who heads a group representing VW and Audi dealers.

Biden Struggles to Convince People to Buy EVs, Only 12 Percent Seriously Considering

On April 18, I reported Biden Struggles to Convince People to Buy EVs, Only 12 Percent Seriously Considering

On July 13, I noted Despite Huge Incentives, Supply of EVs on Dealer Lots Soars to 92 Days

On August 20, I reported Clean Energy Exploitations and the Death Spiral of an Auto Industry

On October 16, I commented Wake Up Mr. President, Consumers Want Hybrids, Not EVs

More accurately, that should read Wake Up Mr. President, Consumers Don’t Want EVs.
 
Actually, the only thing that has changed in 5000 years is technology. Everything else is constant.
Well, there are exceptions. The US was founded and is now being destroyed via corruption and mass migration. Migration of muslim populations around the world have decimated the once vibrant cultures and nations of Europe. The invention of nuclear weapons has once and for all made the extinction of the human race possible without any external requirements, such as meteors or solar flares.
Climate change is at the bottom of the priority list of things humans need to worry about if we want to stay around a while longer.
 
Well, there are exceptions. The US was founded and is now being destroyed via corruption and mass migration. Migration of muslim populations around the world have decimated the once vibrant cultures and nations of Europe. The invention of nuclear weapons has once and for all made the extinction of the human race possible without any external requirements, such as meteors or solar flares.
Climate change is at the bottom of the priority list of things humans need to worry about if we want to stay around a while longer.

My statement was more of a philosophical observation.
In essence what I was saying is that human nature is constant (Greed, jealousy, narcissism, etc). But changing technology has enabled psychopaths, who are always in power to do more and more damage, and excerise more and more control over masses who constantly fall for divide and conquer from the parasite "rulers" who always take advantage of new technologies (be it printing press, or the internet, and everything before (invention of gunpoweder) and after (invention of most modern tech)).
 
In 218 pages have we answered the question?

Should be a pretty clear nope from where I sit.
 
In 218 pages have we answered the question?
See https://diysolarforum.com/threads/c...ith-a-battery-break-through.25299/post-933940

It looks like at least a 10% shortfall even with full electrification. Although, that last 10% looked like there were other solutions available and since some amount of CO2 is removed each year Via natural means adding a little isn't bad.

The bad news is in 2023 the IPCC, fossil fuel companies, and others have said we've done nothing for so long we've passed the low-cost solutions where we can't halt 1.5C without removing CO2 from the atmosphere. I think the jury is still out on if we can keep it under 2 degrees with low cost solutions (e.g., electrification).
 
See https://diysolarforum.com/threads/c...ith-a-battery-break-through.25299/post-933940

It looks like at least a 10% shortfall even with full electrification. Although, that last 10% looked like there were other solutions available and since some amount of CO2 is removed each year Via natural means adding a little isn't bad.

The bad news is in 2023 the IPCC, fossil fuel companies, and others have said we've done nothing for so long we've passed the low-cost solutions where we can't halt 1.5C without removing CO2 from the atmosphere. I think the jury is still out on if we can keep it under 2 degrees with low cost solutions (e.g., electrification).


Actually, numerous times it has been shown that the answer is a clear no.
Solar and Wind will always be complementary to traditional methods. We do not have any means to store the needed amount of energy to compensate for their variable nature, and it looks like we wont have the technology any time soon.
(PS. The environmental damage that Solar and Wind current techs cause is off the scale)
 
Last edited:

diy solar

diy solar
Back
Top