![rumble.com](https://hugh.cdn.rumble.cloud/s/s8/6/x/D/1/j/xD1jp.qR4e.1.jpg)
NEW - Chicago-area Tesla charging stations lined with "dead" electric cars in freezing cold.
NEW - Chicago-area Tesla charging stations lined with "dead" electric cars in freezing cold. @disclosetv on Telegram
![rumble.com](https://rumble.com/i/favicon-v4.png)
I saw that in a different article at work earlier. I laughed at the guy that left his sit all week, at the airport, and came back to a dead battery. People need to do more homework on what they are buying instead of just listening to everything they see on TV / utube, this doesn't just apply to EVs.... The manufacturers should also be more transparent / forthcoming.![]()
NEW - Chicago-area Tesla charging stations lined with "dead" electric cars in freezing cold.
NEW - Chicago-area Tesla charging stations lined with "dead" electric cars in freezing cold. @disclosetv on Telegramrumble.com
Yes but what about that current wonderful software? ?? they figured the economicsThey could be stopping production for a complete retooling of the assembly plant... https://www.motortrend.com/news/next-generation-chevrolet-bolt-coming-2025-mary-barra/
Hopefully learning lots from current technology shortfalls.
I’ve done that before. But I get a jump and I am on the road headed home.I saw that in a different article at work earlier. I laughed at the guy that left his sit all week, at the airport, and came back to a dead battery.
I think current state with technology …they make it ….then do little to no r&d …..just let us spend big bucks on the hype …. and we field test it but they don’t want to fix it. Cost us more money to fix. Customers will eventually take whatever.. supply demand …. They can shut off gas They can shut off power. What would be the purpose? Imagine if they had shut off gas day or two before 6 jan.I saw that in a different article at work earlier. I laughed at the guy that left his sit all week, at the airport, and came back to a dead battery. People need to do more homework on what they are buying instead of just listening to everything they see on TV / utube, this doesn't just apply to EVs.... The manufacturers should also be more transparent / forthcoming.
There was a Tesla in front of me covered in rock salt on the snowy country roads driving just fine and dandy...
I'm really hoping I remembered to add Howes to my last batch of tractor fuel...
It's freaking cold out, things slow down in the cold, this impacts other things... Isn't this elementary info...
Anyway, thanks for letting me ramble.
I've been there a few times (a dead battery) years ago. Popping the clutch on a hill or from a nice push was always fun.I’ve done that before. But I get a jump and I am on the road headed home.
A little bit with regeneration breaking/coasting…I've been there a few times (a dead battery) years ago. Popping the clutch on a hill or from a nice push was always fun.
Wonder if you could bump dead EV going down a steep grade... ?
She continued, “Many of the solutions lie not only in countries working together but, crucially, on businesses and governments, businesses and democracies working together,” adding that “While governments hold many of the levers to deal with the great challenges of our time, business have [sic] the innovation, the technology, the talents to deliver the solutions we need to fight threats like climate change or industrial-scale disinformation.”“Excellencies” and “Dear Klaus”, you’re right, we need to control all information so people don’t think and act differently to how we’d like. https://t.co/eOO2o2kuOx pic.twitter.com/aHAC29jtPz
— m o d e r n i t y (@ModernityNews) January 17, 2024
Furthermore, von der Leyen said 2024 is “the biggest electoral year in history”, and expressed concern that “freedom comes with risks.”Full speech: Unelected President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen addresses "dear Klaus" and her "excellencies," the WEF elites. She calls for overarching globalist control over the flow of all information in the digital age. Report here: https://t.co/eOO2o2kuOx pic.twitter.com/y9RU6RM0ja
— m o d e r n i t y (@ModernityNews) January 17, 2024
NEW - Harvard's Naomi Oreskes says X is "such a toxic place" with a "scary name" at Klaus Schwab's WEF.pic.twitter.com/xTBD8UNd73
— Disclose.tv (@disclosetv) January 15, 2024
Think found the THINK problem. ‘Planting more trees didn’t work so you went to find more books”
We need to stop making books out of trees. Computers were suppose to save trees but seems that didn’t happen even with free internet porn providing wood. The waste baskets across America next to the computers have to many used tissue in them. Have you ever went to someones home to repair their computer and noticed the full waste basket? Wear mask, gloves, and bring your own chair. Don’t look at their browser history or stored temp pictures in windows folder. No no no. Just say no.
Seriously computers were suppose to save trees - less wood but the printers mean more trees cut down then ever. Years ago the Office Depot CEO made bank for printer paper and printers - office supplies. Computers are good example of not doing what was advertised. Green Energy Star. Energy Saver Mode. They did remove most of the GOLD from the modern production versions vs old IBM with 640k monster. ??
Most recent “the office depot CEO Executive PAGE LIST’’ there are several Executives now.
![]()
Office Depot Parent ODP’s Top Compensated Executives In 2022 | CRN
CEO Gerry Smith remained ODP’s most highly-compensated executive in fiscal 2022 despite a slight dip in his total compensation over 2021.www.crn.com
Save the Trees Save the Planet.
Office Depot DEI Green statement So SO Diverse…
Her goal is to have "mass damage and destruction of nature" legally recognized as "a serious crime.""We have this cultural, very ingrained habit of not taking damage to nature as seriously as we take damage to people or property."
Enjoy..."With human rights, mass murder and genocide are serious crimes, but there is no equivalent in the environmental space."
"Unlike an international crime like genocide that involves a specific intent, with ecocide, what we see is that people are trying to do is make money, is farm, is fish... and what's missing is an awareness of the side effects and collateral damage that happens..."
You literally cannot make this shit up! The socials quickly responded...Latest buzzword just dropped from the Devil’s den in Davos.
Farming, fishing and making money is now called “Ecocide.”
So basically if you want to live, you’re committing a crime if these people get their way.
???pic.twitter.com/6hTQMlEsVe
— Kat Kanada (@KatKanada_TM) January 16, 2024
I guess ecocide doesn't include killing whales to put up windmills.
— Jeff Flinn (@JeffFlinn_) January 17, 2024
That's right, NetZero is net population growth of zero. That's what they were after all along, no more euphemisms about carbon emissions, they're moving on.
— Bulagan (@Bulagan1996) January 17, 2024
Ecocide is actually Eliteocide—which is allowing unelected elites, to tell farmers to stop farming, fisher to stop fishing, miners to stop mining—when you allow those things to happen, that is when you starve, unrests happens and society collapses.
Because you listen to the…
— Christopher Olguin (@cjo_olguin) January 17, 2024
"Do as I say, not as I do..."These people are evil.
— Paul G ???? (@Paulgman47) January 17, 2024
Watch: The Most Ridiculous 75 Seconds Of Bullshit From Davos Yet On "Ecocide"
Just when you thought you had heard it all...
This lady (we are presuming she/they is/are a lady) - who looks like she has not missed a meal in her life - explains - with no sense of irony or shame - that farming the land, fishing for food, and worse still 'making money' is now on par with mass murder or genocide.
Jojo Mehta - founder of 'Stop Ecocide Now' - explains in her upper-class English accent to her ultra-rich peers in Davos that:
Her goal is to have "mass damage and destruction of nature" legally recognized as "a serious crime."
Enjoy...
You literally cannot make this shit up! The socials quickly responded...
"Do as I say, not as I do..."
Atmospheric moisture over dry regions not increasing as expected by Climate Models
A basic rule of climate science is that the atmosphere can hold more moisture as it warms. This is known as the Clausius-Clapeyron relationship, and it’s the reason climate models consistently project that atmospheric water vapor will increase as the planet becomes warmer. But in dry regions, this isn't happening.
“What’s the carbon footprint of these events every single year that you come here? Think it’s worth it? Peasants pay for your crimes?” Yemini asked Kerry.CRAZY RAW FOOTAGE: John Kerry’s goons pounce after the US Special Presidential Envoy for CLIMATE found it difficult to justify his carbon footprint in attending the World Economic Forum each year in Davos.
Bookmark and support https://t.co/uvbDgOk19N now! pic.twitter.com/xihfur6VMS
— Avi Yemini (@OzraeliAvi) January 16, 2024
Yemini told Kerry his appearance as the conference suggests this.Biden “climate envoy” John Kerry at the World Economic Forum in Davos: “I am not retiring, folks. I want to make that clear. I am shifting my efforts.” pic.twitter.com/Z7GjPaaJJF
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) January 16, 2024
It’s hard to think of a worse environmental scandal in recent years than Volkswagen’s 2015 diesel-emissions cheating. The German automaker was rightly pursued by regulators, enforcement agencies and class-action lawyers.
The scandal ended up costing Volkswagen an estimated $33 billion in fines and financial settlements—and revealed that diesel-emissions cheating was endemic.
When it comes to electric cars, the government has a cheating scandal of its own. Under an Energy Department rule, carmakers can arbitrarily multiply the efficiency of electric cars by 6.67. This means that although a 2022 Tesla Model Y tests at the equivalent of about 65 miles per gallon in a laboratory (roughly the same as a hybrid), it is counted as having an absurdly high compliance value of 430 mpg. That number has no basis in reality or law.
Until recently, this subsidy was a Washington secret. Carmakers and regulators liked it that way. Regulators could announce what sounded like stringent targets, and carmakers would nod along, knowing they could comply by making electric cars with arbitrarily boosted compliance values. Consumers would unknowingly foot the bill.
The secret is out. After environmental groups pointed out the illegality of this charade, the Energy Department proposed eliminating the 6.67 multiplier for electric cars, recognizing that the number “lacks legal support” and has “no basis.” [Let’s not mince words, how about … illegal subsidy]
Carmakers have panicked and asked the Biden administration to delay any return to legal or engineering reality. That is understandable. Without the multiplier, the Transportation Department’s proposed rules are completely unattainable. But workable rules don’t require government-created cheat codes. Carmakers should confront that problem head on.
While Tesla has missed this year’s third quarter on both earnings and revenue expectations since its Q2 2019 report, the EV leader reported record-breaking carbon credit sales, which the company referred to as regulatory credits.
For over 4 years, the EV maker has been drawing attention by reporting record-breaking income from selling carbon credits. The automaker reported a revenue of $554 million from the Q3 2023 sale of carbon credits, significantly contributing to its profits.
This record sales also represented a huge portion of Tesla’s net income in Q3 2023 ($1,878 million) – 29%. Most notably, its quarter three carbon credit revenue increased 94% year-over-year, marking the value of Tesla’s EV production.
Despite Elon Musk’s “paranoia” over the global economy’s instability due to ongoing wars, its soaring carbon credit income steadily contributes to its overall profits.
A 29% revenue-to-net income ratio is hard to ignore and speaks highly of the value of the credits for Tesla.
It’s not clear who exactly bought the credits and for how much, but most likely they’re sold to other car companies that miss out on emissions standards of the California Air Resources Board (CARB).
This natural gas that is being exported, does it belong to the companies selling and profiting from it?
Or does it come from leases on federal land, and the companies are making money now by selling it cheap to Europe?
If we kept US gas for use by US homes and industry, that would reduce our costs at home and raise our standard of living. Have you seen a utility bill lately? Mine are up several fold over the past couple decades.
Stationary equipment has been converted from diesel to natural gas. Much cleaner. Is it practical to convert or make new semi trucks to use has, and have LNG tanks feeding fueling stations along major highways? Think how much that would clean up our air.
What can I say? It’s not our fault if reality gives us plenty of evidence to refute nonsensical climate claims.Third of UK teenagers believe climate change exaggerated, report shows
YouTube criticised for amplifying lies about the climate with disinformation videos watched by young people
Helena Horton Environment reporterTue 16 Jan 2024 22.00 AEDT
A third of UK teenagers believe climate change is “exaggerated”, a report has found, as YouTube videos promoting a new kind of climate denial aimed at young people proliferate on the platform.
Previously, most climate deniers pushed the belief that climate breakdown was not happening or, if it was, that humans were not causing it. Now, the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) has found that most climate denial videos on YouTube push the idea that climate solutions do not work, climate science and the climate movement are unreliable, or that the effects of global heating are beneficial or harmless.
Researchers from the CCDH gathered a dataset of text transcripts from 12,058 climate-related YouTube videos posted by 96 channels over almost six years from 1 January 2018 to 30 September 2023. They also included the results of a nationally representative survey conducted by polling company Survation which found 31% of UK respondents aged 13 to 17 agreed with the statement “Climate change and its effects are being purposefully overexaggerated”. This rose to 37% of teenagers categorised as heavy users of social media, meaning they reported using any one platform for more than four hours a day.
…
Imran Ahmed, chief executive of the CCDH, said: “Scientists have won the battle to inform the public about climate change and its causes, which is why those opposed to climate action have cynically switched focus to undermining confidence in solutions and in science itself.”
This mentality has seeped into UK politics, with rightwing politicians having campaigned for years to persuade the public that net zero is unachievable and too expensive, and that technologies including electric cars and heat pumps do not work. The prime minister, Rishi Sunak, has said recently that climate solutions are too expensive and rowed back on net zero commitments.
…
Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/environ...lieve-climate-change-exaggerated-report-shows