Where did you learn about this? I've not heard anything about it yet.
In early January I did learn that Missouri COOPs are also trying to get a law passed to redefine net metering as something that is not metering.
Check out
House Bills 1705 and 1854 and see how you read them.
Below is a snip from 1705. From my layman's understanding 1854 reads about the same. In essence it eliminates net metering.
View attachment 196405
it looks like they want the option to bill people with solar differently than people without.
from 1705
58 (2) Offer net metering to the customer-generator pursuant to a commission
59 approved tariff of an electrical corporation or contract approved by the respective
60 governing body of other retail electric suppliers under one of the following options:
61
(a) At rates that [is] are identical in electrical energy rates, rate structure, and
62 monthly charges to the contract or tariff that the customer would be assigned if the customer
63 were not an eligible customer-generator [but shall not charge the customer-generator any
64 additional standby, capacity, interconnection, or other fee or charge that would not otherwise
65 be charged if the customer were not an eligible customer-generator]; or
66
(b) With energy and demand rates, rate structure, and recurring monthly
67 charges that are reasonably calculated to recover that portion of the retail electric
68 supplier's fixed and demand costs that are not eliminated as a result of the operation of
69 the eligible customer-generator's eligible electric energy generating unit
this part i don't like either from both bills.
All qualified electric energy generation units utilizing battery backup
116 shall be installed to operate completely isolated from the retail electric supplier's system
117 including, but not limited to, all neutral connections and grounding points, during times
118 of backup operation
no back feeding the grid with battery power? load sheading?