RayofSunshine
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2021
- Messages
- 98
It would be interesting to know why the asymmetric statements between the 12K and 15K, to wit:
12K:
15K:
My reading of the above is that the 12K utilizes a greater percentage of the maximum input if one is feeding storage in addition to loads/grid, with a hard limitation of 9kW which can can be fed to the latter, while the 15K utilizes a smaller percentage of its maximum input, but loads/grid can get all of its 15kW of AC output, rather than just a subset of that output, and sliced/diced more flexibly (between AC and DC) if storage is in the mix.
If that's true, it represents a pretty significant functional difference between the two inverters, and I suppose it would be helpful to know why. Assuming there is instrumentation on the 15K that enables gathering metrics and reporting for input loads and output allocation, I hope someone will scientifically and rigorously verify the *actual* real-world maximum inputs on each MPPT and collectively, and the maximum AC and DC outputs, and level of flexibility for directing that output. As well as what happens when AC-coupled sources are added to the mix.
Understanding these things is really crucial to knowing what use cases this inverter can address, and how to plan accordingly.
Well, first point: I pushed hard on these specs during our call because a) they were important to me, and b) it was clear to me that they are important to others on this forum. So it was clear to the rep that I wanted clarification. And actually, on the 19.2 kW (PV DC input) limit, he volunteered that info. I read off the "17000W" number from the published spec sheet, and he said, "Actually, it's 19.2: 6500W to each MPPT."
Next point: Yeah, they operate differently; they're different hardware. Regarding the "why", usually, when proposing a new product (software or hardware), an enterprise takes input from Sales/Marketing (what the customer wants), Engineering/Research (what is technically achievable), and Accounting (what is "reasonable", usually with input from Engineering as well). So they have to decide whether to use "off the shelf" ICs, PCBs, and other components, or to design, engineer, and manufacture their own. So it's entirely reasonable that percentages could be different. The specs could be the result of any combination of the above inputs (and more). Also, I look at the differences from another (more "glass half full") perspective. People complained that the name of the product didn't reflect the max AC output to loads, so it has a more representative name. It has 50% more PV DC input to MPPTs than the 12K, 66% more inverter output (combined AC & DC, split up any way you want), 100% more AC coupling, and 114% higher max combined output from simultaneous DC and AC coupling of panels).
As I have said previously, I welcome verification, be it from other Sol-Ark reps or real-world data ac and analysis (which, by the way, I used to do for various auto racing teams). If anyone determines that the specs I forwarded are incorrect, I urge them to contact Sol-Ark for clarification or correction of their specs/documentation.
I fully agree with your final sentence. That is what drove my quest for verification.