Wow...what a long thread.
My one observation after reading about the device/support issues aligns with this comment by solardad:
It seems that one of the root causes of the delayed and/or unimpressive customer service experience may be the procedural difficulty in returning/replacing a product. I have read time and time again how many pictures, videos, tests, etc. SS wants a customer to do to "validate" the need for a return. Looking at the responses and forum comments from tech support, they are spending lots of time running around trying to diagnose mysterious issues in the field and creating correspondence...likely contributing to their poor service response time to other customers. How much technician time and lost sales does this add up to as opposed to simply taking the Sol-Ark approach to either fix it quickly or "just return it and we send you a replacement right now"? Maybe they are shooting themselves in the foot by taking this "customer must be wrong" approach.
How much time and energy was wasted on this single product manufacturing/software/firmware issue so far amongst all the participants? How many other customers are waiting longer in the queue as a result?
My one observation after reading about the device/support issues aligns with this comment by solardad:
@Will Prowse @Watts Happening read a good portion of the thread and did not see one mention of potentially defective unit and an offer from SS to replace. True.. Watts?
For reference Sol-Ark offered to replace my 3 year old 12k after a fatal issue with just one phone call. No 2nd or 3rd tier support calls that require weeks on end scheduling and then a week or two of ghosting like I experienced last summer trying to commission a DOA inverter supplied by SS.
It seems that one of the root causes of the delayed and/or unimpressive customer service experience may be the procedural difficulty in returning/replacing a product. I have read time and time again how many pictures, videos, tests, etc. SS wants a customer to do to "validate" the need for a return. Looking at the responses and forum comments from tech support, they are spending lots of time running around trying to diagnose mysterious issues in the field and creating correspondence...likely contributing to their poor service response time to other customers. How much technician time and lost sales does this add up to as opposed to simply taking the Sol-Ark approach to either fix it quickly or "just return it and we send you a replacement right now"? Maybe they are shooting themselves in the foot by taking this "customer must be wrong" approach.
How much time and energy was wasted on this single product manufacturing/software/firmware issue so far amongst all the participants? How many other customers are waiting longer in the queue as a result?
Last edited: