diy solar

diy solar

very high heatsink temperature on Victron 100/30 MPPT


I wonder if the 100/30 shares the same frame as the 12/12/30 orion. They look similar but I haven't seen the two side by side. Would be a tidy fan set up for it fit.
That’s pretty slick. Would make my wife happy to not have a janky fan wired up in our only clothes closet in the trailer. ?

Just messaged the seller to see if he thinks his fan would fit the 100/30 MPPT.
 
Here is a guy who does a good job of documenting how much heat reduction and the corresponding increase in amp output he achieved for the Victron Dc-DC charger by running a fan powered by the input side of by the unit. The fan only runs when his vehicle is running.
Ducting made a noticeable difference.

 
Does not include a fan, but I'm definitely going to add one to my 12/24/15.
 
My Victron 100/50 runs hot AF... All my EP ever gear is nice and cool thanks to the huge heatsinks
 
this thread leads me to believe the Victron MPPTs & DC-DC chargers require a support infrastructure just to deal with the heat! "over-priced Eurotrash" label justified?

I'm going to guess that like a faster PC, their chargers throw out more heat than others because they are switching the fets at a faster rate to keep up with changes and because it probably allows array voltage to climb higher in relation to battery voltage for better MPPT.

If the end result is more energy harvested, who cares if you have to put a $5.00 PC fan on the back to keep it cool.
 
Last edited:
If the end result is more energy harvested, who cares if you have to put a $5.00 PC on the back to keep it cool.
Do they harvest more energy? When you consider 10+% loss in Vmp due to panel temperature & 10+% loss in the heatsink, MPPTs' advantage over PWMs is lost.

note: bold emphasis above is mine.
 
Where did you get those numbers?
The op on this thread estimates 35 Watts of heat dissipated. Besides, it's a well known fact that MPPTs deliver only about 90% of the harvested power to the battery bank. The often claimed efficiency of "up to 98%" is when the panel voltage is about 2X the battery bank voltage (25-30Vmp for a 12V bank) and the current is about 50% of the rated max (15 Amps for a 30A controller).

Temperature derating of Si panelss Vmp & Pmp: Cell temps above 25 reduce the Vmp bu about 0.4-0.5%. If the cells are at 45C, the drop in Vmp/Pmp is 20C times 0.5% or 10%. Panels often run much hotter than 45C, and can reach 60C even under moderate ambient temperatures.
 
The op on this thread estimates 35 Watts of heat dissipated. Besides, it's a well known fact that MPPTs deliver only about 90% of the harvested power to the battery bank. The often claimed efficiency of "up to 98%" is when the panel voltage is about 2X the battery bank voltage (25-30Vmp for a 12V bank) and the current is about 50% of the rated max (15 Amps for a 30A controller).

Temperature derating of Si panelss Vmp & Pmp: Cell temps above 25 reduce the Vmp bu about 0.4-0.5%. If the cells are at 45C, the drop in Vmp/Pmp is 20C times 0.5% or 10%. Panels often run much hotter than 45C, and can reach 60C even under moderate ambient temperatures.

What does either of these have to do specifically with victron or any given brand for that matter?

In regards to the earlier comment, who on earth is running PWM anymore?

I'm going to go eat paste now.
 
If the end result is more energy harvested, who cares if you have to put a $5.00 PC on the back to keep it cool.

My rough math suggests that my Victron 100/30 charge controller is producing at least 15% more power than my previous Renogy Rover 30A. Both have a 100v input limit and max 30A output, but my guess is like yours that the maximum power point tracking is significantly faster on the Victron, which accounts for producing more power with the same system.
 
Those were hard to watch with absolutely nothing conclusive. Pretty janky setup... drawing exterior air in to cool it. That could ether be good or bad. I didn't see it, but if one doesn't document ambient temperature for comparison, the data have far less value.

Anybody that has hefted a Victron MPPT will note that they're pretty dense. They're filled with silica to enhance heat transfer from hot components to the surface, i.e., it's getting heat from the components to the surface faster, and there's a lower delta between the components generating the heat and the radiating surfaces. In other words, while the surface is hotter, the guts aren't as hot as they would be otherwise.

The temperature range of the MPPT is rated at AMBIENT meaning they're designed to work when the cooling air is 60°C, not the unit itself. When ambient is 40°C, the unit may throttle output due to higher internal temps. They're referring to values the user can measure, not the unreported internal temperature of the unit.

Is cooling desirable? Sure. Why not?
 
Those were hard to watch with absolutely nothing conclusive. Pretty janky setup... drawing exterior air in to cool it. That could ether be good or bad. I didn't see it, but if one doesn't document ambient temperature for comparison, the data have far less value.

Anybody that has hefted a Victron MPPT will note that they're pretty dense. They're filled with silica to enhance heat transfer from hot components to the surface, i.e., it's getting heat from the components to the surface faster, and there's a lower delta between the components generating the heat and the radiating surfaces. In other words, while the surface is hotter, the guts aren't as hot as they would be otherwise.

The temperature range of the MPPT is rated at AMBIENT meaning they're designed to work when the cooling air is 60°C, not the unit itself. When ambient is 40°C, the unit may throttle output due to higher internal temps. They're referring to values the user can measure, not the unreported internal temperature of the unit.

Is cooling desirable? Sure. Why not?

Victron MPPTS don't have a "device temp" measurement?
 
Back
Top