diy solar

diy solar

Can Solar & Wind Fix Everything (e.g., Climate Change) with a battery break-through?


The Hertz Meltdown Reveals Scale Of The EV Debacle​


The Biden administration’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has revealed its ambition: to phase out gas-powered cars in favor of electric vehicles (EVs). Incredibly, this announcement comes as we are flooded with overwhelming evidence that EVs are a market loser.

Indeed, the artificial boom and then meltdown of the EV market is a modern industrial calamity. It was created by government, social media, wild disease frenzy, far-flung thinking, and the irrational chasing of utopia, followed by a rude awakening by facts and reality.

CEO of Hertz Stephen Scherr has been booted out due to a vast purchase of an EV fleet that consumers didn’t even want to rent. The company has now been forced to sell them at a deep discount and in a market where consumers are not particularly interested.

Looking back, however, Scherr’s decision to bet everything on an EV boom was a disaster that was highly praised at the time. Only last year, the company bragged: “This morning, [Hertz] was recognized by The White House for our efforts to expand access to electric vehicles across the country. Demand for EV rentals is growing and we’re here to help our customers electrify their travels.”

Pleasing the Biden administration is not the same as pleasing consumers.

The demand turned south fast in a real-world test of drivers. But that’s not all. Hertz could not make their investment pay no matter what they did.

The key issues with EVs are as follows.

The cost upfront is much higher.

Financing charges are higher.
They depreciate at a higher rate than internal combustion cars.
The insurance is more expensive, by at least 25 percent.
Repairs are much more expensive, if you can get them done at all, and take longer.
Tires are more expensive and don’t last as long because the car is so heavy.
Refueling is not easy and missteps here can have nightmarish consequences.

They are more likely to catch fire.

Any motor vehicle accident that impacts the battery can lead to repairs higher than the value of the car, that is totaled with so much as a scratch.


To top it all over, there is no longer any financial advantage to the driver. It now costs slightly more to charge under many conditions than to refuel with gasoline.

The novelty of driving one for a day wears off after the first day. At first they seem like the greatest thing that ever happened, like an iPhone with wheels. That’s great but then the problems crop up and people start to realize that they are fine for urban commutes with home chargers and not much else.

They make truly terrible rentals. Obviously, under rental conditions, people have to use charging stations rather than a charger in the garage. That means spending part of your vacation figuring out where to find one.

Not all are superchargers, and if it is a regular charger, you are looking at an overnight wait. If you do find a station with fast chargers, you might have to wait in line. They might not work. You waste hours doing this. And you likely have to reroute your trip even to find a station without any certainty that you will get a spot with a functioning charger.

No one wants to do this. When you rent a car, all you want is a car that goes the distance. And typically car rentals are for going some distance else you would just take a taxi or a Lyft from the airport. You might need to drive several hours. And god forbid that this takes place in cold weather because that can reduce your mileage by half. Your whole trip will be ruined.

Why in the world would anyone want to rent one of these things rather than a gas-powered car? You might be better off with a horse and carriage.

Did Hertz think of any of this before they spent $250M on a fleet? Nope. They were just doing the fashionable thing.

Again, I’m not knocking some uses for EVs. If you think of them as enclosed and souped up golf carts, you get the idea. They can be wonderful for certain urban environments so long as you don’t overuse them and have to get them repaired. You also have to be in a financial position to afford the higher costs all around, from financing to insurance to repairs and tires. And you have to be prepared to take a big loss on resale, if you can even manage to find a buyer.

There is money to be made in this market, as there is with any niche good or service. But that is covered with normal market conditions, not massive subsidies, mandates, and frenzies. The Hertz case proves it. It is a perfect clinical trial of these machines. We now know the answer. They cannot work.

And thank goodness because if the United States truly switched over in a big way from gas to electric, we would face other disasters. The wear and tear on roads is much worse due to the sheer weight of the cars, which is 25 percent higher than gas cars on average. Many parking garages would have to be rebuilt with new reinforcements.

Then there is the strain on the grid. There is no way the industry could handle the demand. Brownouts and travel restrictions would be essential. All this would pave the way toward 15-minute cities.

Please remember how this craze began. It was lockdown time and automakers suspended orders for parts and chips. They stopped cranking out cars. When demand intensified, the chip makers had moved on to other things, so delays escalated. By the summer of 2021, there was a general panic about a growing car shortage.

At that point, consumers were willing to buy anything on the lot, among which EVs. The sales records were completely misinterpreted. The manufacturers made huge investments, and the car rental companies did too. But the product had not really been tested. That test is taking place now, and the EVs are completely failing.


We keep hearing that this is still too early, that development has a long way to go, that more charging stations are coming, that manufacturers are going to overcome all these problems in time. All of this sounds very similar to what the producers of mRNA shots say: this was just a trial run and they will get better the next time.

Maybe but doubtful. There is a huge problem in the investment market right now. EVs are massive losers. Consumers, manufacturers, car rental companies, and every other market in which these lemons are made available are running away from them as fast as possible. They had their day in the sun and got fried.

There is another problem: surveillance. The car can be tracked anywhere and shut off at a moment’s notice. This is obviously a great thing if the government desires a social-credit system of citizens control.

At this point, it is doubtful that the industry can recover.
And yet, even now, the Biden administration is planning more subsidies, more mandates, more restrictions on gas cars, and digging themselves even deeper into this hole.

“The Biden administration on Wednesday issued one of the most significant climate regulations in the nation’s history, a rule designed to ensure that the majority of new passenger cars and light trucks sold in the United States are all-electric or hybrids by 2032,” reports the New York Times.

You simply cannot make up nuttier stuff. At some point, we could see manufacturers making the cars just to satisfy the central planners but otherwise preparing to chop them up and throw them out. They would likely be happy to dump them in the ocean but that isn’t allowed either.
 

The Hertz Meltdown Reveals Scale Of The EV Debacle​


The Biden administration’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has revealed its ambition: to phase out gas-powered cars in favor of electric vehicles (EVs). Incredibly, this announcement comes as we are flooded with overwhelming evidence that EVs are a market loser.

Indeed, the artificial boom and then meltdown of the EV market is a modern industrial calamity. It was created by government, social media, wild disease frenzy, far-flung thinking, and the irrational chasing of utopia, followed by a rude awakening by facts and reality.

CEO of Hertz Stephen Scherr has been booted out due to a vast purchase of an EV fleet that consumers didn’t even want to rent. The company has now been forced to sell them at a deep discount and in a market where consumers are not particularly interested.

Looking back, however, Scherr’s decision to bet everything on an EV boom was a disaster that was highly praised at the time. Only last year, the company bragged: “This morning, [Hertz] was recognized by The White House for our efforts to expand access to electric vehicles across the country. Demand for EV rentals is growing and we’re here to help our customers electrify their travels.”

Pleasing the Biden administration is not the same as pleasing consumers.

The demand turned south fast in a real-world test of drivers. But that’s not all. Hertz could not make their investment pay no matter what they did.

The key issues with EVs are as follows.

The cost upfront is much higher.

Financing charges are higher.
They depreciate at a higher rate than internal combustion cars.
The insurance is more expensive, by at least 25 percent.
Repairs are much more expensive, if you can get them done at all, and take longer.
Tires are more expensive and don’t last as long because the car is so heavy.
Refueling is not easy and missteps here can have nightmarish consequences.

They are more likely to catch fire.

Any motor vehicle accident that impacts the battery can lead to repairs higher than the value of the car, that is totaled with so much as a scratch.


To top it all over, there is no longer any financial advantage to the driver. It now costs slightly more to charge under many conditions than to refuel with gasoline.

The novelty of driving one for a day wears off after the first day. At first they seem like the greatest thing that ever happened, like an iPhone with wheels. That’s great but then the problems crop up and people start to realize that they are fine for urban commutes with home chargers and not much else.

They make truly terrible rentals. Obviously, under rental conditions, people have to use charging stations rather than a charger in the garage. That means spending part of your vacation figuring out where to find one.

Not all are superchargers, and if it is a regular charger, you are looking at an overnight wait. If you do find a station with fast chargers, you might have to wait in line. They might not work. You waste hours doing this. And you likely have to reroute your trip even to find a station without any certainty that you will get a spot with a functioning charger.

No one wants to do this. When you rent a car, all you want is a car that goes the distance. And typically car rentals are for going some distance else you would just take a taxi or a Lyft from the airport. You might need to drive several hours. And god forbid that this takes place in cold weather because that can reduce your mileage by half. Your whole trip will be ruined.

Why in the world would anyone want to rent one of these things rather than a gas-powered car? You might be better off with a horse and carriage.

Did Hertz think of any of this before they spent $250M on a fleet? Nope. They were just doing the fashionable thing.

Again, I’m not knocking some uses for EVs. If you think of them as enclosed and souped up golf carts, you get the idea. They can be wonderful for certain urban environments so long as you don’t overuse them and have to get them repaired. You also have to be in a financial position to afford the higher costs all around, from financing to insurance to repairs and tires. And you have to be prepared to take a big loss on resale, if you can even manage to find a buyer.

There is money to be made in this market, as there is with any niche good or service. But that is covered with normal market conditions, not massive subsidies, mandates, and frenzies. The Hertz case proves it. It is a perfect clinical trial of these machines. We now know the answer. They cannot work.

And thank goodness because if the United States truly switched over in a big way from gas to electric, we would face other disasters. The wear and tear on roads is much worse due to the sheer weight of the cars, which is 25 percent higher than gas cars on average. Many parking garages would have to be rebuilt with new reinforcements.

Then there is the strain on the grid. There is no way the industry could handle the demand. Brownouts and travel restrictions would be essential. All this would pave the way toward 15-minute cities.

Please remember how this craze began. It was lockdown time and automakers suspended orders for parts and chips. They stopped cranking out cars. When demand intensified, the chip makers had moved on to other things, so delays escalated. By the summer of 2021, there was a general panic about a growing car shortage.

At that point, consumers were willing to buy anything on the lot, among which EVs. The sales records were completely misinterpreted. The manufacturers made huge investments, and the car rental companies did too. But the product had not really been tested. That test is taking place now, and the EVs are completely failing.


We keep hearing that this is still too early, that development has a long way to go, that more charging stations are coming, that manufacturers are going to overcome all these problems in time. All of this sounds very similar to what the producers of mRNA shots say: this was just a trial run and they will get better the next time.

Maybe but doubtful. There is a huge problem in the investment market right now. EVs are massive losers. Consumers, manufacturers, car rental companies, and every other market in which these lemons are made available are running away from them as fast as possible. They had their day in the sun and got fried.

There is another problem: surveillance. The car can be tracked anywhere and shut off at a moment’s notice. This is obviously a great thing if the government desires a social-credit system of citizens control.

At this point, it is doubtful that the industry can recover.
And yet, even now, the Biden administration is planning more subsidies, more mandates, more restrictions on gas cars, and digging themselves even deeper into this hole.

“The Biden administration on Wednesday issued one of the most significant climate regulations in the nation’s history, a rule designed to ensure that the majority of new passenger cars and light trucks sold in the United States are all-electric or hybrids by 2032,” reports the New York Times.

You simply cannot make up nuttier stuff. At some point, we could see manufacturers making the cars just to satisfy the central planners but otherwise preparing to chop them up and throw them out. They would likely be happy to dump them in the ocean but that isn’t allowed either.

Even Svetz knows this. He back-handedly calls us stupid by posting videos from weird looking foreigners that claim we are victims of misinformation with titles like:

"Show this video to the Uncle who used to touch you which shows him why global warming isn't a hoax"

While Svetz himself is not self-subsisting off solar while living in Florida (For Pete's sake!) while driving a hybrid instead of a full electric and living on an Island that's barely above sea-level.

All Liberals are like Svetz. The one thing you can count on is their elitist hypocrisy.
 
Or sell the cars at severe losses while increasing the cost of gas cars to cover the expense.

Or as liberal goofball would say:

"Adding the Social Cost of carbon into the price"
 
The mad rush to deal with climate change, even if it works (it won’t), has a nasty tradeoff (more global poverty).
aenyc, some of think we are procrastinating, some feel we are years behind on dealing with the issue.
it's possible god will step in and save the weakest among us(planet earth/wildlife) from us, or it's even
possible global warming is just a misunderstanding of the numbers, if both these things are not possible
the outcome would be very bad for the weakest among us. even if one of them are true what is the
harm done?

cleaner air, cleaner water, more wildlife, more dry land.

has a nasty tradeoff (more global poverty)
aenyc, I can't think of a single thing that human have not found a way to profit from.
there are people that make a profit from your shit, recycling solar panels is putting food
on someone's table today, it's seems the bigger the problem the more people that can eat.
WW2 that was a big problem, and lot of people got feed because of it, and the problem was solved(win/win).


Capture354.PNGCapture355.PNG
 

IPCC to blame for inaction: Graphs are hard to read

The hunt for lost apple varieties to protect fruit in climate crisis

Climate change could be a deciding factor in 2024 election

Cocoa Prices Triple in One Year as Climate Change Hits

Climate - the Movie: a hot mess of (c)old myths!


Shell Is Closing 1,000 Gas Stations To Focus On EV Charging


You can't fool Mother Nature​

Unless you're planning to drive around in a vacuum, the best any car can
do is still limited by the drag coefficient of the body.

A Ford F-150 has a drag coefficient over 0.5 and is near the of top of the
range as an air mover.

The Aptera was built to minimize drag, with a coefficient of 0.13!
On a good day it recharges 40 miles of range with its built-in solar panels.

But, a number of new cars have surprisingly low drag coefficients:
luna-desert-shot.jpg

The $26,000 semi-solar-powered Aptera has a coefficient of 0.13​

OIF.V6xnqhZfhfwrlJhQ3tM8SA

Mercedes EQXX - 0.17​
OIP.ZQGMuTi8FXAlop41hkvsGwHaFb

VW XL1 - 0.19​
ORA4.5ABB8FE148D42338F8E56DF80581A55A_76074520ADD021B0

Mercedes EQE - 0.20​
ORA4.ADF439E01D7D604342B15FC21C547B6B_54A90316F8240CC2

Tesla Model S - 0.21
OIP.KQA6Sqz1-ros2LJINUcgdQHaEj

Hyundai Ioniq 6 - 0.21
OIP.WF3uOMT11U7dgLla0OrW3wHaEK

Lucid Air - 0.21​


Quotes from those in the business:
  • Ken Cohen, Exxon CEO: ... Climate change is real and appropriate steps should be taken..." ref
  • Mike Wirth, Chevron CEO" “Climate change is real. There’s no doubt about it,” ref
  • Gretchen Watkins, Shell CEO: "...urgent need for action on climate change" ref
Dude, I am sorry they were preaching a new ice age by 1990 when I was in grade school. we had this big shebang where we had to do a 500 word report on other forms of energy. I concentrated on nuclear and hydro electric. (Pre 3 mile island) so the climate crazies have been going at it for over 5 decades. its all bullshit and an attempt to grab others money, or to control them via fear.. just like covid was.
 
We keep hearing that this is still too early, that development has a long way to go, that more charging stations are coming, that manufacturers are going to overcome all these problems in time. All of this sounds very similar to what the producers of mRNA shots say: this was just a trial run and they will get better the next time.

There is another problem: surveillance. The car can be tracked anywhere and shut off at a moment’s notice. This is obviously a great thing if the government desires a social-credit system of citizens control.
and this is why my newest car is considered a throw away. come shut off my bare bones work truck which does not have any of that shit. come shut off my Real truck (this is japan so my real truck is a real truck). F350. its a 7.3l superduty made in 99 and has no provisions for any of that stupidity. the newest car we have is a 2012 Toyota Crown Royal saloon. no provisions for shutdown either.

FJB and all of his perverted syncopates
 
It seems that the adoption of AI in daily life is quite significant in the U.S. According to a Pew Research Center survey, 27% of Americans report interacting with AI several times a day, and another 28% interact with it about once a day or several times a week1. This suggests that over half of the population engages with AI regularly. Another source indicates that 26% of consumers say they interact with AI on a daily basis2. These statistics reflect a growing integration of AI into everyday activities, from personal assistants to recommendation systems in various services. [ref: Copilot]
Opinion: This is very fast adoption. It sort of reminds me when hand calculators first came out. But back then, the results were accurate.... ; -)

Light-duty vehicles, commercial light trucks, and freight trucks comprise approximately 78% of delivered energy used by the transportation sector.
...farmers and agricultural groups have called on USDA toincrease its engagement in helping farmers adapt to changing climatic conditions...
...Shipping hydrogen by pipeline in the United States is not new, but the existing pipeline network is small and located almost entirely along the Gulf Coast. ...
...analytical methods and treatment technologies to detect and manage emerging contaminants (e.g.,... and microplastics);
 
@svetz
There is no manmade climate crisis or any kind of climate "crisis". The whole thing is hoax, end of story.
The only crisis we have is that of egotistic parasites and psychopaths who want to control everyone.

After all, we all know that climate change makes for shorter winters . . . except for when it makes for harsher winters.
And climate change means less snow . . . except for when climate change means more snow.
And climate change causes droughts in California and floods in Texas and Oklahoma, and generally makes wet places wetter and dry places drier, except when it makes wet places drier and dry places wetter.
And climate change causes more hurricanes at the same time as it causes fewer hurricanes.
Climate change causes more rain, but less water? . . . And less rain, but more water?
Climate change decreases the spread of malaria at the same time as it increases the spread of malaria. (But don’t worry! The Terminator himself advises us not to listen to those climate change cynics, hey guys?)
Climate change makes San Francisco foggier.
Climate change makes San Francisco less foggy.
Climate change causes duller autumn leaves.
Climate changes causes more colourful autumn leaves.
Climate change makes for less salty seas.
Climate change makes for saltier seas.
Climate change causes the polar ice caps to melt.
Climate change causes the polar ice caps to freeze.
Climate change makes the earth hotter, unless the earth isn’t getting hotter, in which case climate change can explain that, too!
 
The only crisis we have is that of egotistic parasites and psychopaths who want to control everyone.
aenyc, that is one way to characterize it, IMO you are not lone in your thoughts, I would think
that about 15% of the US population thinks holocaust never happened, and think all the evidence is
made up by psychopaths who want to control everyone , I think if you asked every American how
old is the world, I would think 15% would say 5000yrs old. the only ones that think it's in the billions of
years old are the egotistic parasites. IMO lucky for us must of this type thinking is screaming at the sky(currently)

I think this because things are happening to help mitigate the harm done.


Capture356.PNGCapture357.PNG

 
@TommySr that is a strawman argument.
We are not talking about Holocaust or Hitler.
We are talking about climate change "crisis", or lack there of.
The entire climate change crisis narrative is completely made up. End of story.
 
@TommySr that is a strawman argument.
We are not talking about Holocaust or Hitler.
We are talking about climate change "crisis", or lack there of.
The entire climate change crisis narrative is completely made up. End of story.

I have him blocked but these silly heads are one trick ponies.

Everything is racist and hitler.
 
@TommySr

There is no manmade climate crisis or any kind of climate "crisis". The whole thing is hoax, end of story.
The only crisis we have is that of egotistic parasites and psychopaths who want to control everyone.

After all, we all know that climate change makes for shorter winters . . . except for when it makes for harsher winters.
And climate change means less snow . . . except for when climate change means more snow.
And climate change causes droughts in California and floods in Texas and Oklahoma, and generally makes wet places wetter and dry places drier, except when it makes wet places drier and dry places wetter.
And climate change causes more hurricanes at the same time as it causes fewer hurricanes.
Climate change causes more rain, but less water? . . . And less rain, but more water?
Climate change decreases the spread of malaria at the same time as it increases the spread of malaria. (But don’t worry! The Terminator himself advises us not to listen to those climate change cynics, hey guys?)
Climate change makes San Francisco foggier.
Climate change makes San Francisco less foggy.
Climate change causes duller autumn leaves.
Climate changes causes more colourful autumn leaves.
Climate change makes for less salty seas.
Climate change makes for saltier seas.
Climate change causes the polar ice caps to melt.
Climate change causes the polar ice caps to freeze.
Climate change makes the earth hotter, unless the earth isn’t getting hotter, in which case climate change can explain that, too!
 
NBC did a poll in 2014 too, so... progress?
images

Of course, that's about if humans caused it... which we have proven as carbon isotopes in the air clearly demonstrate where the CO2 came from.
A lot more people believe it's occurring and is a problem, some are unsure, and some are in denial.

Depending on the poll, the percentage of people that believe climate change is a hoax is between 11 to 15%. Which honestly is pretty good (assuming they aren't politicians ; -). Consider other famous denials that don't even have PR firms paid to sow disinformation:



That puts deniers just above those that believe the Earth is flat, around those that think the moon landing is a hoax, and less than those who think the Earth formed a few thousand years ago.
 

Where is it safe from Climate Change?​

Yesterday I picked on Miami and pointed out that it was a slow and gradual change that most of us wouldn't live to see. But where is it safe?
The 2024 Realtor.com Housing and Climate Risk Report found that more than 44.8% of the country’s homes face at least one kind of “severe or extreme climate risk”

That is to say, few places are exempt. Weather events will continue to nickel and dime us as they have in the past:
2022_BDD_combo_histogram_costs_event.png

The more we don't spend on fixing the root cause, the more we spend on cleanup.

Here are a few snapshots from an interesting set of climate maps.... Take these with a grain of salt as the level of confidence from the IPCC even going out a 100 years isn't that great.

Farm Crop Yields: 2040-2060, Good news... if you're a farmer in North Dakota:​

1711367206181.png

Today
1711367370385.png
2070
1711367410106.png
RPC8.5
1711367448800.png
 

Watch the Game-Changing New Film That Explodes Climate Change and Net Zero Lies​

A potentially game-changing film on the fraudulent climate change narrative and the collectivist Net Zero project hits global social media screens today. “Climate change is an invented scare of self-interest and snobbery, cynically promoted by a parasitic, publicly-funded establishment hungry for power and money,” says writer Martin Durkin. The attitude of middle class environmentalists can be summed up as “how can we stop people buying cheap things in shops”, observes Baroness Claire Fox. On the science side, the 2022 Nobel Physics laureate Dr. John Clauser asserts: “There is no correlation between temperature change and carbon dioxide – it is all a crock of crap.”

The new film is a long-awaited sequel to Durkin’s The Great Global Warming Swindle film shown on Channel 4 in 2007. The outcry from activists at the time led to the banning of sceptical climate science views across most mainstream media, bans that continue to this day. The new film is called Climate: The Movie and features many top sceptical climate scientists. It lays out the politically-supressed views surrounding natural climate variation in riveting and persuasive detail. As Durkin notes at the beginning, his new film is the story of how an eccentric environmental scare grew into a powerful global industry. “When I hear people pontificating about a rise of one and a half degrees, I think what have they been smoking,” says Emeritus Professor William Happer of Princeton.

“There is no climate emergency. There is no evidence of one,” comments Dr. Patrick Moore, one of the original founders of Greenpeace. Around 20,000 years ago, CO2 was at the lowest level it has ever been in the history of the Earth. The gas is currently 420 parts per million (ppm) in the atmosphere and has recovered from 180 ppm. “If it had gone down another 30 ppm, we would all be dead,” observes Moore. The film quotes other scientists noting that CO2 levels were much higher in the past at times of very high biodiversity levels on the planet. One of the numerous ‘scams’ identified in the film is that there is little correlation between CO2 and temperatures across the 500 million year record. In fact, recent ice core evidence shows periods when temperatures rose ahead of increases in CO2. The opinions and hypotheses surrounding unproven anthropogenic climate change simply do not stand up to past scientific observations.

“We should be very grateful that CO2 levels are beginning to go back up – there is not enough fossil fuel to get to historical levels, but at least we can make a start,” observes a mischievous Professor Happer. “CO2 is quite unimportant in controlling Earth’s climate,” says Dr. Clauser. For him, the behaviour of clouds is “hundreds of times more powerful than the trivial effect of CO2”.

The science of climate features heavily in the film and clear explanations are provided throughout. “Compared to the last 500 million years the Earth is exceptionally cold,” explains Durkin. The reason there is ice at the poles is that we are in an ice age, observes Moore. “We are at the tail end of a 50 million year cooling period, and they say it is too hot,” he adds. As regular readers of the Daily Sceptic will be aware, recent surface measurement have been badly corrupted by growing urban heat. Former NASA scientist Dr. Roy Spencer, who has studied the urban heat effect in great detail, calculates that most of the measured urban warming since 1880 is due to the urban heat effect.

Many of the issues discussed in the film will be familiar to Daily Sceptic readers – from the biased UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change only considering human involvement in the climate (it would be out of a job if it found humans were not that important) to the trillions of dollars spent on Government-mandated inferior green technologies.

The corruption of ‘settled’ science is widely discussed with click-bait, well-funded scientists feeding doomsday climate predictions into the public space via the unquestioning mainstream media. Few corruptions are more blatant than attaching bad weather events to long-term changes in the climate. Science writer Tony Heller calls it “absurd”, adding, “there is no basis to it, it is biased propaganda”. The capture of scientific journals is almost complete with any scientist questioning the ‘settled’ narrative unlikely to be published. Starting out in their careers, academics from numerous disciplines are more or less advised to keep their mouths shut about the narrative or lose students, grant funding, the ability to publish work and ultimately their jobs.

Universities and science bodies around the world have lost their hard-won reputations for the unbiased pursuit of truth through the scientific process. In its place is a grubby rush for cash in the interest of promoting an ideological fad.
The Durkin film shows in clear detail that the science attributing all climate change to humans using hydrocarbons is far from settled, and is disputed by many distinguished academics of considerable scientific standing. Net Zero and the stories about the climate that accompany it is a political project. “If you are a climate activist, you are actually facilitating a huge validation of the Government running our lives,” says Claire Fox. Net Zero demands on governments mean they can “interfere in every nook and cranny”, she argues.

But it is towards the end of his excellent film that Durkin shows the true wickedness of the Net Zero agenda. In Africa, diseases and early deaths are widespread as developed countries refuse to sanction investment in hydrocarbon energy. Women still cook on dung fires causing lung disease and blindness. Agriculture suffers from a lack of tractor power and fertiliser. Meanwhile, diarrhoea is endemic and billionaires send pills to mask the symptoms. But Western banks will not lend money to provide hydrocarbon-powered refrigeration and clean water infrastructure. The greens think that Africans should not use hydrocarbon resources, and this sums up the “ruthlessness and depravity” of the agenda, says Dr. Benny Peiser of the Global Warming Policy Foundation.


 
After browsing this thread, I must ask if any one of you people ever actually studied climate science.

Several references to Florida under water by 2020, yet not a single reference to the source of that idea.

Several references to the effects of water vapor having been ignored by scientist yet not a single reference to any sources for that claim.

This is a classic example of the BS that infects the minds of people who only get their information from social media.

There are several books on the market that explain the science behind climate.

Example: https://open.umn.edu/opentextbooks/textbooks/860

You should at least read one prior to making comments on the issue.
 
After browsing this thread, I must ask if any one of you people ever actually studied climate science.

Several references to Florida under water by 2020, yet not a single reference to the source of that idea.

Several references to the effects of water vapor having been ignored by scientist yet not a single reference to any sources for that claim.

This is a classic example of the BS that infects the minds of people who only get their information from social media.

There are several books on the market that explain the science behind climate.

Example: https://open.umn.edu/opentextbooks/textbooks/860

You should at least read one prior to making comments on the issue.

What make/model of electric car do you drive and lets see some pics of your solar setup.
 
aenyc, that is one way to characterize it, IMO you are not lone in your thoughts, I would think
that about 15% of the US population thinks holocaust never happened, and think all the evidence is
made up by psychopaths who want to control everyone , I think if you asked every American how
old is the world, I would think 15% would say 5000yrs old. the only ones that think it's in the billions of
years old are the egotistic parasites. IMO lucky for us must of this type thinking is screaming at the sky(currently)

I think this because things are happening to help mitigate the harm done.


View attachment 204247View attachment 204249

Tommy, you stated that you didn’t believe in the holocaust
I think it's possible the holocaust never happened, it was a TV plot, kind of like
the war of the worlds kind of thing
Post in thread 'America's melting pot'
https://diysolarforum.com/threads/americas-melting-pot.80508/post-1034244

We are in agreement - think it involved the allies did horrible things… dropping nukes on japan probably was not necessary either but we wanted to tast the sciene….. we got from Nazi Germany. It came out of a captured UBoat at end of War with Germany. The Germand were sending their war - technology to their ally in Japan. We fire bombed direct known german civilians…war crimes.



checkthisout, it's something we all know about, taught in public schools.
and yet there is no consensus even now.

~13:30 he talks about “dangerous times for past history leaders”. Back then = you insulted someone they would probably beat your ass or end the offender …. Not today but back then. The history is littered with politicians and ppl dueling with pistols and swords.

I want the Police to go away…..because BLM Antifa was right the police should be gone. The Police don’t protect us - the police protect them. 🤡🤣😀 I noticed when BLM Antifa counter protest - started shit would cry run to Police. Kinda funny because the BLM Antifa wanted the police gone up until point they were going to get their ass beat then it was Police save me…..help me.. Funny. BLM Antifa have me in agreement think the police should go away. They - BLM Antifa were Right.

You can tell those 2 ppl in your video will be giving each other a hand job or more once the video stops. They are biased asf. They might film their dress up gay sex too. Which one will be the woman? Again their views are projected…. sound act tranny too. Is being straight = bigotted? Is being christian and against 2 men in dresses corn holing and them wanting to get pregnant = bigoted? I must be a bigot because am not accepting their mental illness as normal. The real science says 2 men can’t reproduced nor can 2 women reproduce. Prove me wrong. I don’t share those values and nothing nor anyone can change that…. Saying tranny homo sex is right = a no….from me. It is a sickness - mental illness on display from them in particular when one or other want to pretend to be other sex. It is just that pretend. Reality in normal World Mental illness.

Tommy ….That video you posted is for weak minded ppl. It is very - extremely biased.

Climax Change is the new Religion of Science where ppl virtue signal. Want to be part of the bigger then life change they would otherwise not be capable. Most ppl conned never realize it until much later. 🤡👉🏻🦴🫣🐑 Fleeced.
 
Back
Top