@Dr Do2much
You realize that the "blue" are links with references to the Establishment Media do you? One more time just for you
@Dr Do2much
We have done much more research that you would care to admit, and the numerous links posted here prove it. You however, chose to ignore anything that does not suit your preferred narrative.
Here we go again, just for you! Examples of this nonsense, complete made up garbage (i.e. cLIEmate crisis/change)
After all, we all know that climate change
makes for shorter winters . . . except for when it
makes for harsher winters.
And
climate change means less snow . . . except for when
climate change means more snow.
And climate change causes
droughts in California and
floods in Texas and Oklahoma, and generally makes
wet places wetter and dry places drier, except when it makes
wet places drier and dry places wetter.
And climate change causes
more hurricanes at the same time as it causes
fewer hurricanes.
Climate change causes
more rain, but less water? . . . And
less rain, but more water?
Climate change
decreases the spread of malaria at the same time as it
increases the spread of malaria. (But don’t worry! The Terminator himself
advises us not to listen to those climate change cynics, hey guys?)
Climate change makes San Francisco foggier.
Climate change makes San Francisco less foggy.
Climate change causes duller autumn leaves.
Climate changes causes more colourful autumn leaves.
Climate change makes for less salty seas.
Climate change makes for saltier seas.
Climate change causes the polar ice caps to melt.
Climate change causes the polar ice caps to freeze.
Climate change makes the earth hotter, unless
the earth isn’t getting hotter, in which case climate change
can explain that, too!
What’s the problem here? This sounds like the
perfect scientific theory. It can explain literally everything, including self-contradictory things! This means it’s absolutely perfect, isn’t it?
Well, no, not according to Karl Popper and the philosophers of science.
And within the philosophy of science, there’s something called the demarcation problem. How do you differentiate science from pseudoscience?
If you’re at all interested in this, I would suggest you read through Karl Popper’s
Conjectures and Refutations, in which he lays out his criterion for differentiating science and pseudoscience, namely
falsification.