diy solar

diy solar

Dr Strangetroll : or how I learned to stop arguing and be amused by the intransigence

You aren't from Germany. You are CdKipp or some other imposter.
Wasn't born yesterday LOL
Probably earlier, lol :)

Seriously, I am a German expat, living in Spain. I have to find my way in 3 natural languages (plus a bit of French and Italian), plus a few formal languages. So my grammar and word treasury will sometimes be lacking.
 
What EXACTLY did I post that was misinformation? What did I make up .... or what did the people in the link I posted make up?

YOU are the one making a strawman made up argument.
Bob,
Did you know that "BaronVerde" suddenly joined the "DIY Solar Forum" on Feb 10th after losing his home to a volcano on an island somewhere ?
:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
And just happens to stumble into the political thread about vaccines, masks, etc ?
 
Bob,
Did you know that "BaronVerde" suddenly joined the "DIY Solar Forum" on Feb 10th after losing his home to a volcano on an island somewhere ?
:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
And just happens to stumble into the political thread about vaccines, masks, etc ?
I'm just getting tired of the peanut gallery types accusing others of misinformation while they make up strawman arguments and misquote what was posted. Do crude personal attacks and then report others .... It's clear they are here to muddy up the waters and try to make it impossible for the average person to sort out the truth.

It's pretty clear the Baron isn't who he claims to be ... probably Kipp with software to mask his IP.
 
I'm just getting tired of the peanut gallery types accusing others of misinformation while they make up strawman arguments and misquote what was posted. Do crude personal attacks and then report others .... It's clear they are here to muddy up the waters and try to make it impossible for the average person to sort out the truth.

It's pretty clear the Baron isn't who he claims to be ... probably Kipp with software to mask his IP.
Nope I have been reading this nonsense. All of this has been explained to Bob and BMcl before. They are using unscreened raw data. In the case of Pfizer’s list of adverse events of significant interest. That is just a list of things they want to watch for more specifically. Nothing to see here. Nonsense.
 
Nope I have been reading this nonsense. All of this has been explained to Bob and BMcl before. They are using unscreened raw data. In the case of Pfizer’s list of adverse events of significant interest. That is just a list of things they want to watch for more specifically. Nothing to see here. Nonsense.
Now who is giving disinformation.........
 
I am not @Cdkipp. And you have no basis for such a claim. An admin could trace our IP address (but has certainly better thingds to do than feed the trolls), mine is from a telecom conpany in Spain, the internet krakens regularly put me where I am, in Santa Cruz de La Palma right now.

I am as sorry as possible, @Cdkipp. I personally have pegged you as a reasonable guy. But there's nothing I can do if people decide to switch to blackmailing and schoolyard talk like 8 years old.

Let's recapitulate: a list of counter indications is a legal requirement for a pharma firm. There is nothing to see. Billions have been vaccinated (and frankly I think the guys here, too), some of them got a red spot on the skin or an itching, and these things are also in there. The list is 'correct', but doesn't contain many grave effects. If so, and unsure you're an affected person, go see you doctor and ask them. It is that simple but yesterday's snow by now.

The VAERS database is a freely filled and unregulated list of adverse effects open to everyone and is meant is to track events around vaccinations (a "frontline early warning system"). Everyone can write in there, not just doctors and nurses. Action was, is being, and will be taken if effects are confirmed and worth the effort. Since the database is up and running for a long time, it has served much its purpose by now. Europe has similar thing, I don't recall anyone using it as a placebo for not being vaccinted.

Guys, just post reliable information. You know eaxactly what I mean. And I belive you're actually vaccinated, too.
 
Last edited:
Sorry, but this is really scary sounding : https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73/htm#B39-cimb-44-00073

The messenger RNA from Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine reportedly can enter human liver cells and be converted into DNA, contrary to what the CDC has said.

A study by Swedish scientists finds that when the vaccine's mRNA enters human liver cells it triggers a number of reactions that yield a reverse transcription that turns the mRNA into spike DNA.

The scientists, in their study published in the journal Current Issues of Molecular Biology, state that they have found "evidence that COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 is able to enter the human liver cell line Huh7 in vitro."

They write that BNT162b2 (the Pfizer vaccine), is reverse transcribed inside human liver cells as quickly as six hours after injection.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said that the reverse transcription process is something that would not happen, The Epoch Times also reports.

Under a CDC site page "Myths and Facts about COVID-19 Vaccines," the agency writes, "The genetic material delivered by mRNA vaccines never enters the nucleus of your cells. ... COVID-19 vaccines do not change or interact with your DNA in any way."

Pfizer said only that its vaccine does not alter the human genome.

"Our COVID-19 vaccine does not alter the DNA sequence of a human cell. It only presents the body with the instructions to build immunity," the pharmaceutical giant told the Times.

The Swedish study is the first time that researchers have shown how an mRNA vaccine can transform into DNA.
 
That must be observed, though you're making an elephant out of a fly. In vitro transcriptions of mRNA isn't new and doesn't scare me, millions of dead from COVID do scare me.

But a living organism is quite a different thing than a lab tube. Classically, mRNA vaccines have no vector to alter human DNA because the effect is known, but with the spike protein transfer of the Pfizer vaccine observed in a lab environment despite its design to the contrary, this may have to be corrected ... in a lab tube, not necessarily in a living organism. We'll most certainly read more about this soon. Science is an open field.

e.g.:

and Pop Science ecplaining the process in general terms:

This will certainly be monitored further, and if there's imminent danger (which the article does not imply !), a correction will be found, if it is necessary at all.

<fun>
I got 3 Biontech/Pfizer shots, will report when I turn into a slug or some such
</fun>
 
Last edited:
This video has just been released

Dr. Andrew Hill, The Man Who Killed Millions?


March 4, 2022 | Sundance

Dr. Andrew Hill, MD, is a senior visiting Research Fellow in the Pharmacology Department at Liverpool University.

Dr. Hill graduated from Oxford University, and attained his PhD from Amsterdam University. Dr. Hill has worked in the scientific and medical fields for more than three decades, with a specific expertise in the field of developing antiretrovirals.

Dr. Hill is considered one of the world’s preeminent experts, and it was because of his specific skillset that in October of 2020, Dr. Andrew Hill was tasked to report to the World Health Organization on the dozens of new studies from around the world suggesting that Ivermectin could be a remarkably safe and effective treatment for COVID-19.

However, as a medical scientist, Dr. Hill also held several financial conflicts within his research. He received funding for his work from the same industry institutions who would benefit financially from a vaccination protocol. One organization was the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation who funded Unitaid, the organization Dr. Hill admits had influence over his final determinations.

On January 18, 2021, Dr. Hill completed his contracted review and published his findings. Dr. Hill advised that “Ivermectin should be validated in larger appropriately controlled randomized trials before the results are sufficient for review by regulatory authorities.” His decision gave the medical research community the space to claim Ivermectin was ineffective, and thus the Big Rx vaccination protocol was affirmed.

In this video, the single most influential person in the anti-Ivermectin narrative, Dr. Andrew Hill, admits to knowingly shaping his findings based on institutional influence and withholding information about the efficacy of Ivermectin while millions of people were dying. This video is absolutely stunning. WATCH:

 

The story of online threats and abuse is very dark. In early 2021, my research team was analysing a new drug called ivermectin. In the first clinical trials, this drug seemed to prevent new infections and improve survival. When I first wrote about this, I started getting regular threats on Twitter, demanding that ivermectin should be approved worldwide and questioning the safety of vaccines.

In March 2021, I received my first vaccine dose and posted a photo on Twitter from the clinic. Within minutes I was receiving strange messages: “Why would you do that?”, “not safe”, “why not use ivermectin instead”, “you are paid by the Gates Foundation”. One person even sent a link to a suction device to remove the vaccine fluid from my arm. Any message I sent promoting the benefits of vaccines led to threats and abuse.


However, we then found several examples of medical fraud in the clinical trials of ivermectin: some of the databases had been simply made up by unscrupulous doctors. When we filtered out all the poor-quality clinical trials, there was no longer any clinical benefit for ivermectin.


Common triggers for abuse against scientists were them offering views on Covid vaccination, face masks and drug efficacy.
Scientists abused and threatened for discussing Covid, global survey finds

Read more
After we reported on the medical fraud in July 2021, the abuse became much worse. I was sent images of Nazi war criminals hanging from lamp-posts, Voodoo images of swinging coffins, vivid threats that my family were not safe, that we would all burn in hell. This was happening most days – I opened my laptop in the morning to be confronted with a sea of hate and disturbing threats. Twitter did nothing after I reported these threats. So I had to shut down social media.

There were also threats to my scientific reputation on email. I know many other scientists who have been threatened and abused in similar ways after promoting vaccination or questioning the benefits of unproven treatments like ivermectin. If scientists cannot communicate for fear of threats and abuse, how can all the misinformation be controlled?

If we allow this misinformation to be spread unchecked, there is a real danger that people won’t get vaccinated – they will believe that they can take an alternative treatment and be protected, even if there is no real proof. These people could then get infected, hospitalised and even die of Covid. There are so many unvaccinated patients being hospitalised in the UK, when they could have made a different choice with the right information.

A Twitter spokesperson said: “Abuse and harassment have no place on our service. Our investments in proactive technology continue to reduce the burden on people to report to Twitter by surfacing more content for review. More than 65% of tweets we take action on for abuse are now proactively surfaced using technology, rather than relying on reports to Twitter.”

Dr Andrew Hill PhD is a senior visiting research fellow in the Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics at the University of Liverpool
 
WATCH:

Yes .... it is beyond criminal what was done to suppress these treatments that worked and saved lives. There were several protocols that were extremely effective, but all were suppressed.

I can only hope that that those responsible will held to account .... I hate to be negative, but I will be surprised if they ever are. Medicine has been totally corrupted.
 
Yes .... it is beyond criminal what was done to suppress these treatments that worked and saved lives. There were several protocols that were extremely effective, but all were suppressed.

I can only hope that that those responsible will held to account .... I hate to be negative, but I will be surprised if they ever are. Medicine has been totally corrupted.
You are making this up. Just stay away from silly, possibly dangerously misinforming videos on biased online video platforms. Go to the sources.

One can go out on a search and find out about how "extrenely effective" it really is. Several studies found initial promising results, and then self medication lead to grave events. A drug needs to prove its efficiency in independet clinical tests, and Ivermectin did not (yet) pass these tests. Hands off that stuff ! It is potentially life threatening snake oil ot this moment.

'Murricans see this for real information (as of Oktober '21):

The rest of the world doesn't even care, they get vaccinated.
 
Last edited:
You are making this up. Just stay away from silly, possibly dangerously misinforming videos. Go to the sources.

One can go out on a search and find out about how "extrenely effective" it really is. Several studies found initial promising results, and then self medication lead to grave events. A drug needs to prove its efficiency in independet clinical tests, and Ivermectin did not (yet) pass these tests. Hands off that stuff ! It is snake oil ot this moment.

'Murricans see this for real information (as of Oktober '21):

The rest of the world doesn't even care, they get vaccinated.

I choose to believe all the front line doctors who have developed very effective protocols. The official "sources" have been corrupted.
 
Well, "all those front line doctors" are a bunch of biased influencers and politicians and the official sources are the goto in case of doubts, that's my credo. And I go to the sources if I have the time. And that's difference between us. I am not at all into believing, I need data. Our lives took different courses, it seems :)
 
Well, "all those front line doctors" are a bunch of biased influencers and politicians and the official sources are the goto in case of doubts, that's my credo. And I go to the sources if I have the time. And that's difference between us. I am not at all into believing, I need data. Our lives took different courses, it seems :)
Sorry that you would rather believe people sitting in cubicles who have never treated a patient over doctors who have treated thousands of Covid patient and know what works and what doesn't.
 
I choose to believe all the front line doctors who have developed very effective protocols. The official "sources" have been corrupted.
“ Front line doctors” is the name they call themselves. They are not actually front line doctors.
 
Sorry that you would rather believe people sitting in cubicles who have never treated a patient over doctors who have treated thousands of Covid patient and know what works and what doesn't.
my God. how stupid can you be? They are either “research” doctors or have been,Ickes out of their hospital. Get a clue.
 
my God. how stupid can you be? They are either “research” doctors or have been,Ickes out of their hospital. Get a clue.
Careful .... we may have to start repeatedly reporting you
 
Back
Top