An earlier reply in this thread, the poster said he filed a corner and it was copper. With conflicting info on Amazon, I’ve emailed Li Time.
They replied stating: “screws are stainless steel, terminals are copper silver plated”.
I’ve emailed back for clarification.
I -hope- they’re copper, as they’re real nice bus bars with covers.
For those thinking TL;DR you will be missing out on intersting stuff if you don't at least read the text of the message - I don't blame you for skipping the attached.
I hang my head in shame and regret that I have but one set of buss bars to sacrifice to the cause. Actully, I'll use them just the same.
After reading this I went back and filed deeper and more. Earlier I stopped too soon when I was filing the corner down and I saw copper. Under the copper plating is brass.
I am no metallurgist or plater but I would bet you have to plate brass with copper to get the top layer of nickle to stick.
I admit my error and am forever shamed...
ok, maybe not, it was an honest mistake after all.
Edit - found this
Copper plating under Nickel is definitely not compulsory, but if you do choose to add this step into the plating process it will definitely
improve the overall finish of the Nickel.
AND ------- Chatgpt answers some nagging questions.
So, to redeem myself I asked chatgpt to tell me how much current they could carry - The conversation is below along with driving into the difference between copper and brass and then into temperature/resistance at each post.
So even the worst quality brass used as a bussbar for this would still carry more than twice the rated capacity and not heat more than a degree or so. Even using a steel washer between the lug and the bussbar with a tight connection isn't an issue. It becomes and issue when in an enclosed space and corrosion is present. I would never advocat for it, but from the data listed it is not as bad as it would seem.
Question :
Back to capacity calculation on buss bar, assume the cheapest brass, what is the current carrying capacity... assume the best quality brass for use as a bussbar... and then copper made for bussbar use.... give it to me in a little chart
Answer : (chatGPT)
To provide a comparison of the current-carrying capacity of busbars made from the cheapest brass, the best quality brass, and copper specifically made for busbar use, we'll consider the typical conductivity values for these materials and calculate their ampacity. The current-carrying capacity largely depends on the conductivity of the material.
1. **Cheapest Brass**: Typically has lower conductivity due to a higher zinc content. Let's assume a conductivity of about 28% IACS.
2. **Best Quality Brass**: Higher-quality brass for electrical use will have higher copper content, thus better conductivity. We can assume a conductivity of about 50% IACS.
3. **Copper**: Copper used for busbars is usually highly conductive, close to 100% IACS.
The ampacity calculation will be based on the cross-sectional area of the busbar and the current density, which is influenced by the material's conductivity. For simplicity, let's use the same dimensions for the busbar as before (25.5mm wide, 6.5mm thick), and we'll use a conservative range of current density of 4 to 6 A/mm² for brass, adjusting for the conductivity, and 6 to 8 A/mm² for copper.
Let's proceed with these calculations and present them in a chart.
Here's a comparison of the current-carrying capacity (ampacity) for busbars made from the cheapest brass, the best quality brass, and copper, based on the typical conductivity values and the dimensions you provided earlier (25.5mm wide, 6.5mm thick):
| Material | Min Ampacity (A) | Max Ampacity (A) |
|---------------------|------------------|------------------|
| Cheapest Brass | 663 | 994.5 |
| Best Quality Brass | 828.75 | 1160.25 |
| Copper | 994.5 | 1326 |
- **Cheapest Brass**: Assumes a conductivity of about 28% IACS, leading to an ampacity range of 663 A to 994.5 A.
- **Best Quality Brass**: Assumes a conductivity of about 50% IACS, with an ampacity range of 828.75 A to 1160.25 A.
- **Copper**: Assumes a conductivity close to 100% IACS, resulting in an ampacity range of 994.5 A to 1326 A.
This table highlights the significant difference in current-carrying capacity based on the material's conductivity, with copper providing the highest capacity due to its superior conductivity.
Question :
Define AICS as relates to this conversation
Answer : (chatGPT)
In our conversation, "IACS" was mentioned, which stands for the International Annealed Copper Standard. It's a standard used to compare the electrical conductivity of various conductive materials. Here's a brief overview:
1. **IACS Definition**: IACS is a measure of electrical conductivity where the conductivity of annealed copper is defined as 100% at a temperature of 20°C (68°F). This standard was established because annealed copper (a form of copper that has been softened by heating and cooling) has very high electrical conductivity.
2. **Use in Comparisons**: The IACS value is used as a benchmark to compare the conductivity of other materials. For instance, a material with a conductivity of 50% IACS would have half the electrical conductivity of annealed copper.
3. **Application in Our Discussion**: In the context of our discussion, IACS was used to compare the electrical conductivities of different types of brass and copper. Since pure copper is at 100% IACS, brass, which is an alloy of copper and zinc, has lower IACS values (such as 28% to 50% IACS), indicating lower electrical conductivity compared to pure copper.
Understanding IACS is important in applications where electrical conductivity is a key factor, such as in the design and use of busbars and other electrical conductors.
The rest is in the attached text file and should make for an interesting read -- the Full session and the raw text for tho