Yep.I have a question about HA.
Can it connect with more than one SA?
Yep.I have a question about HA.
Can it connect with more than one SA?
I have an emporia too but it couldn't do what SA does. Think if it this way the emporia has no interface itself and processes no data internally. EVERYTHING is sent to emporia's webservers. All your seeing and using is their website. All the emporia device itself does is snag/store/relay data. It can't even hold more than so many minutes of data before its lost.That's odd, since it's fairly common practice. My Emporia view is working just fine on an ESP32, recording 16 channels of information down to the second, serving it up to the web, allowing me to analyze it...
The ESP is handy and I use them but to compare it to the SA discussion here is like saying you want to run windows 10 on the ESP and store a database and plot graphs and act as a server to broadcast data real time to another server (home assistant) and support storing all of the protocols with all of the inverters SA has to work with and act as a webserver that supports all known browsers with the latest security updates, etc. The list goes on and on. All of this at one time. Not happening.for clarity, in this context, the ESP would just shuttle data to some raspberry/orange pi single board computer.
that's what i took from it. maybe mistaken.
modularity system design concept
That could work.with multiple devices connected, i agree that an ESP would likely have a difficult time doing database duty even with the best of codes.
the architecture that interests me is like
SCC -> ESP#1 -> WiFi/Ethernet -> RasPi#1 -> SA/HA
BMS -> ESP#2 -> WiFi/Ethernet -> RasPi#1 -> SA/HA
Inverter -> ESP#3 -> WiFi/Ethernet -> RasPi#1 -> SA/HA
one raspberry pi for SA/etc and one ESP for each individual reporting device.
that way i can use RJ45 or WiFi as connection, rather than many USB cables, which can introduce grounding issues.
and benefit from cheap commodity ethernet/wifi switch/accesspoint.
There is no HA integration for these inverters. That's the point. SA enables it.If you could interface with your hardware via other means, is there much benefit to SA over just using HA integration?
I can't directly interface my inverter with HA.Is there anything significant that you can't do from HA that you can from SA, or that SA is just much better at?
If you can point me to a HA integration which interfaces with my EASun inverter (Voltronic / Axpert Max family, same as the MPP 8048 Max), I'm all eyes and ears.I haven't found much that you can't, relatively easily (from what I can tell) integrate into HA directly.
I first used Solar Assistant to monitor three G4LL/GYLL batteries under a (pre-hybrid) Magnum/Midnite system. RS485 USB cable between one battery and the SA. No inverter or charge controller connection. Simple and effective.What I'm not sure about is whether SA can operate with just batteries/BMS and not be connected to an inverter.
Yes have been using it for 18 months.Solar Assistant is a solar system monitoring and remote control app. It can also be used for home automation and load control.
I am using this poll to measure its popularity on the forum. I have never used it before, but am curious how many people are using it.
I'm sure there are many inverters that I haven't even heard of, but would this work? https://esphome.io/components/pipsolar.htmlIf you can point me to a HA integration which interfaces with my EASun inverter (Voltronic / Axpert Max family, same as the MPP 8048 Max), I'm all eyes and ears.
The graphs are basic but informative.
Probably the best part about it is the MQTT broker to send stats to Home Assistant or other displays.
Use a. POE hat and you're golden..thanks!
undervoltage crashes have visited me a number of times before. kinda picky about PSUs..
interesting to hear about the absence of power supply brownout issues. cheers
And to be honest..Solar Assistant changed my satisfaction with the Growatt from meh to wow. I’m using a Victron smart shunt to report the batteries SOC but the built in reporting in the Overkill BMS is also quite accurate. It integrates everything together in to one very functional control and operation common platform. I can’t imagine not having it on my system.
About some complaints regarding the proprietary software violating GPL agreements, this is occurring across several industries and so far hasn’t been challenged in a court of law. In the court of public acceptance, the trend has been positive and I don’t see it changing. I dabble in astrophotography and ZWO makes a Pi based device with proprietary software and incompatibility with third party hardware. People are buying them up like crazy.
Also the whole Victron family , then I am in. Quite happy with VRM but the Growatt server sucks !I wish SA supported Schneider and Outback but according to the email I got back they never will. I really wanted to use it to monitor a future system on those two inverters.
I've no idea.I'm sure there are many inverters that I haven't even heard of, but would this work? https://esphome.io/components/pipsolar.html
I've no idea.
Seems to be an unsupported home project, not a finished product I can just plug in and follow a set up guide or wizard. There's no support, no manual, no info on hardware, no info of how to build or how to connect it.