sunshine_eggo
Happy Breffast!
If you did that then it sounds like *all* the cells are bad with a high self discharge rate.
This.
If you did that then it sounds like *all* the cells are bad with a high self discharge rate.
Well, I didn't do anything, now they're balanced:
View attachment 155162
Are we there yet?
You are much closer than before. Increase the pack voltage 0.5V and see where the cells are at.Are we there yet?
Charge them up over 3.4V and let the balancer do it's job. You have about 0.025V delta, the cells will be fine.They did discharge up to 3.1. Now they're having a bad time staying balanced during charge:
They did discharge up to 3.1. Now they're having a bad time staying balanced during charge:
And I guess I have gotten them really close to where they should have been:
That's the first time I've heard the word lusciously used with a battery...but I agree. I'm happy with anything under .06that's a lusciously balanced battery.
That's the first time I've heard the word lusciously used with a battery...but I agree. I'm happy with anything under .06
I have to admit I had to look in the dictionary (non-native English speaker here).that's a lusciously balanced battery.
Coming in late to this conversation... But this is the source of the original balance problem. I've seen the recommendation elsewhere on the forum occasionally to leave cells attached after reaching 3.65V (or whatever) during top balance, and it's a bad idea.After settling, the voltage was about 3.350 V on each cell. At that point I "un-parallelled" the cells and started to build the battery but the BMS was connected a week later due to lack of time.