jasonojordan
New Member
Well it took 599 posts but it looks like you’ll get your full refund.
What’s that saying a squeaky wheel gets the grease. Lol.
Flip side is the nail that sticks out gets hammered too lol
Well it took 599 posts but it looks like you’ll get your full refund.
What’s that saying a squeaky wheel gets the grease. Lol.
I couldn't agree more.Don't forget the personal attacks.
Combining incompetence with unprofessional behavior, not a good business choice.
And the op did get hammered.Flip side is the nail that sticks out gets hammered too lol
You run your house completely on dc power ?
Ac in this sententence means alternating current
Absolutely. I had an issue with a 6500ex and their support was subpar and the way I managed to get them to pay their attention was to complain on the forum. They asked me to do so much troubleshooting of my connections for a system that had been running non-stop for months.It seems that one of the root causes of the delayed and/or unimpressive customer service experience may be the procedural difficulty in returning/replacing a product. I have read time and time again how many pictures, videos, tests, etc. SS wants a customer to do to "validate" the need for a return. Looking at the responses and forum comments from tech support, they are spending lots of time running around trying to diagnose mysterious issues in the field and creating correspondence...likely contributing to their poor service response time to other customers. How much technician time and lost sales does this add up to as opposed to simply taking the Sol-Ark approach to either fix it quickly or "just return it and we send you a replacement right now"? Maybe they are shooting themselves in the foot by taking this "customer must be wrong" approach.
unit was found to have had :Damage to the rectifier board and battery connection
Currently unrepairable.
Customers now the beta testers... sounds about right with some industries LOL. That includes workout equipment (e.g. nordictrack) and others.The software industry has moved past internal testing.. it's all about live testing now baby! You find the problems, get them to admit there is a problem, then they can work on fixing it, if they can duplicate it.
I just looked into what is going on with this situation. It looks like our system pulled the tax during the process of crediting your account. I will personally make sure that the remainder of your cost is returned to you right away. I apologize for the inconvenience
Hi @Watts Happening and friends hereHello @Watts Happening
On behalf of Lux Power, I sincerely apologize for your recent experience. I will personally take the time to investigate this matter with EG4 leaders team. Regardless of the outcome (I haven't had the chance to discuss it with anyone at EG4 yet), but I want to guarantee you that we will provide a fair resolution regarding your refund. We will also ensure that there is a full update on this matter.
My best reagrds!
It is true some how but that all features listed on the data sheet are indeed functional and compliant with the certifications and listings we possess, it's important to emphasize that the pursuit of improvement has no end. We greatly value our early users who purchase and use our products, and one fundamental principle guides us: ensuring our customers' satisfaction is our top priority.Customers now the beta testers... sounds about right with some industries LOL. That includes workout equipment (e.g. nordictrack) and others.
That is a great philosophy and approach, and one I wish Signature Solar shared with you.It is true some how but that all features listed on the data sheet are indeed functional and compliant with the certifications and listings we possess, it's important to emphasize that the pursuit of improvement has no end. We greatly value our early users who purchase and use our products, and one fundamental principle guides us: ensuring our customers' satisfaction is our top priority.
Based on this principle, we believe that all distributors and dealers should have a no question return policy in place for a specified period, with the ultimate aim of consistently delivering a happy experience with our products.
Thank you
So long as that is communicated with transparency before purchase, I see nothing wrong with it. Saving money and knowing it's going to be a development process, great for many people. However when something is marketed as the next great thing and is ready to solve all of your problems, you set expectations accordingly. This goes for any manufacturer/retailer.part of the reason there is tier one products ( paying customers are not expected to do testing that should have been done before release )
that count for everybody? I installed a 6kw one for a client, it's idle consumption is over twice what it was supposed to be and every 3-4 months it's scc fails to wake up and charge the batteries(which the client usually doesnt realize til midnite on day 2 when he has to crawl out of bed to start his generator. I've called sig multiple times about it, but the only solution offered was "maybe" a firmware update could fix it, but if it went wrong it could brick the unit. this unit is primary power in an offgrid install. without having a backup unit to install this seemed foolhardy.Send me your email address on a DM. Let's talk about some options and work something out you can be happy with long term.
So long as that is communicated with transparency before purchase, I see nothing wrong with it. Saving money and knowing it's going to be a development process, great for many people.
Totally agree, a free product for testing is a totally different thing. I'm under NDA for multiple companies, the fortunate thing there is a much tighter integration between parties.Beta programs provide the product as compensation for the data collection and working through issues as well as an NDA so you won't flood forums like this.
If you paid for a product, it either meets the published feature set, or if it doesn't you are not getting what you paid for. Some techie types might not be bothered but my professional experience would indicate otherwise.
this unit is primary power in an offgrid install. without having a backup unit to install this seemed foolhardy.
when I installed it there where multiple positive reviews an both the seller and the product, and virtually no negative reviews (that I saw anyways) they where touting their US BASED customer service and US Based warranty. multiple "reputable" product reviewers on youtube where singing their praises of both signature and growatt, I already had multiple years (positive) experience with mppsolar's products, and these where reviewed and touted as at least equivalent. I did inform the customer that these where what I considered "tier 2" products, not Tier 1 (Schneider outback SMA) and where priced accordingly. The client was a friend on a budget and we took a risk. needless to say I have not been impressed with the after sale service.And you saw the solution as cheap low end Chinese hardware with notoriously inconsistent distributor support and ZERO manufacturer support?
I agree with the bolded portion but in a different way... IMHO, anyone installing these things commercially is asking to have an unhappy customer base and THAT is what seems foolhardy.
I understand the concerns you're trying to express here, but I can't fully endorse these accusations.Beta programs provide the product as compensation for the data collection and working through issues as well as an NDA so you won't flood forums like this.
If you paid for a product, it either meets the published feature set, or if it doesn't you are not getting what you paid for. Some techie types might not be bothered but my professional experience would indicate otherwise.
It’s a shame you didn’t visit my house so we could solve the issues first hand. I understand that’s ultimately not the most realistic scenario but I wish it had been the case.I understand the concerns you're trying to express here, but I can't fully endorse these accusations.
Consider the facts: many customers are still using our inverter with the old firmware last year. As for our new product, based on what we put in the datasheet, I don't see any differences from the real using experience. Take the EG4 18KPv, for instance; it's been on sale since May 2023, and the returns and defects have been less than 1% (I know you might find this hard to believe, but that's the reality). But I really agree we still have a lot room to improve.
Yes, the improvement is an ongoing process. The first Tesla Model S was sold in 2012, and it continues to receive updates every 1-3 months. I understand we're not at Tesla's level, being a small company, but I hope you can still see our commitment to improving product performance.
So far, we've been encouraged by most of the positive feedback and motivated by some criticisms and suggestions. If you have specific concerns that suggest we've cheated users, please feel free to point them out.
In the past 1~2 months, I and other distributors have spent a lot of time visiting installers and homeowners. Their feedback has been overwhelmingly positive, along with valuable suggestions for us to improve.
Regarding @Watts Happening 's experience, we regret it but are also relieved that they received a full refund promptly the day after raising the issue. If you have any more insights to share or areas where we can improve, please let us know. We can encourage EG4 to handle similar issues more effectively in the future.
Also the more I read that response, the more at a loss I am as to you're point.And you saw the solution as cheap low end Chinese hardware with notoriously inconsistent distributor support and ZERO manufacturer support?
I agree with the bolded portion but in a different way... IMHO, anyone installing these things commercially is asking to have an unhappy customer base and THAT is what seems foolhardy.