energy0605
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2019
- Messages
- 4
Hello all. I am at the point where I will be purchasing some lithium batteries for a solar install on my Hi-Lo trailer. My private solar installer temp. based in Arizona
recommended Lifeblue for its Bluetooth capabilities and its benefits in below freezing conditions. I came across this "alleged" response from the CEO of Battle Born on 8/27/2018 from a forum online:
"In any case we decided early on to not put Bluetooth internally because 1) you can monitor cycles SOC, V, current, etc. externally using Victron equipment among others, 2) we were concerned that the battery would last longer than the Bluetooth version since that changes rapidly, and 3) we did not want to include something internally that could break over time when we find it not completely necessary." The CEO went on to say:
"But the main issue with the Lifeblue battery is their choice of prismatic cells-- which are cheaper, but did not last as long in our cycle tests. The reason they don't last as long is that, since they are more massive than the smaller cylindrical cells, they cannot dissipate heat as well. They are also harder to capacity match, because capacity variations are much larger. By contrast, smaller cells may be matched individually, and then matched again as modules. That is what we do. And finally, cylindrical cells are encased in stainless steel and are much less susceptible to moisture contamination, which can also cause capacity degradation." My question is what do you think of these statements and which lithium battery would you recommend?
recommended Lifeblue for its Bluetooth capabilities and its benefits in below freezing conditions. I came across this "alleged" response from the CEO of Battle Born on 8/27/2018 from a forum online:
"In any case we decided early on to not put Bluetooth internally because 1) you can monitor cycles SOC, V, current, etc. externally using Victron equipment among others, 2) we were concerned that the battery would last longer than the Bluetooth version since that changes rapidly, and 3) we did not want to include something internally that could break over time when we find it not completely necessary." The CEO went on to say:
"But the main issue with the Lifeblue battery is their choice of prismatic cells-- which are cheaper, but did not last as long in our cycle tests. The reason they don't last as long is that, since they are more massive than the smaller cylindrical cells, they cannot dissipate heat as well. They are also harder to capacity match, because capacity variations are much larger. By contrast, smaller cells may be matched individually, and then matched again as modules. That is what we do. And finally, cylindrical cells are encased in stainless steel and are much less susceptible to moisture contamination, which can also cause capacity degradation." My question is what do you think of these statements and which lithium battery would you recommend?
Last edited: