yep, basically the same as a humanThe internet is a series of tubes.
While I don’t know how to do this you are correct that it can be done. I met someone who has his own direct line of sight access to the internet. He is a hamm radio guy and had it on one of his towers. But I didn’t get a chance to grill him on how he does it.You assume I want super fast internet and watch youtube and netflix and the bells and whistles? As I said I would accept a compromised version. Most of that high bandwitch stuff is brain rotting anyway. Did you look at the front page of youtube lately? Also I am using linux right now. 90% of what I do is research anyway so basic text access from a linux terminal browser would be fine.
I also began internet in the mid 90s on 28kbs dial up to start.
So I am wondering is any access going to be stealing access rather than legit as you would be just using the lines of those companies anyway? Like you have to tap into that either surreptitiously or legitimately. I am asking is there no way to communicate with the internet with your own equipment I think is a better way to put it. For example I can communicate with people across the world on the internet without actually having anything to do with the companies they are renting access from. Can you not adhoc your own access somehow to engage with the internet at large?
this can easily go dozens of miles so you have to define long range as well2.4 ghz doesn't really do long range.
If there is a tree, bush, pollen, offensive language 2.4 goes nowhere range wise.this can easily go dozens of miles so you have to define long range as well
I, and others, further clarified my position throughout this thread.The being off grid and internet needs to be defined to get anywhere with this.
It is also throughput.If there is a tree, bush, pollen, offensive language 2.4 goes nowhere range wise.
Remember 2.4 ghz was picked for sticking consumers devices in a range that had pathetic range so more devices could function in a given area without conflicting.
That's why things were moved out of the 900mhz range which is FAR superior in range and penetrating characteristics.
Tall towers with elevated receiving points is the only way to get anything out of 2.4. House to barn isn't what I consider long range. Also with 2.4 seasonal issues run rampant with leaves growing messing things up.
If there is a tree, bush, pollen, offensive language 2.4 goes nowhere range wise.
Now its the other way around. The 900mhz band is pretty clean these days.With high gain directional antennas, you can overcome some of these, but not all. About 20 years ago, my home internet link was service from a neighborhood co-op ISP. Standard (2002 era) consumer 2.4 Ghz wifi radios with 24dBi parabolic antenna on one end and an 8dBi omni on another. I think the distance was between 5-6 miles.
One other advantage of 2.4Ghz for home wifi is it wasn't (at the time) crowded out by analog wideband 900Mhz cordless phones, baby monitors, etc.
Down the Tubes - George CarlinThe internet is a series of tubes.